Pinch point
The stark comparison between new legal service providers and traditional firms’ approach to clients’ contact shows a way forward for all firms. In many solicitors offices there is a pinch point that restricts the ability of a firm to grow, the traditional solicitors’ receptionist and switchboard operator.
In the past their job was to direct phone calls, greet visitors or send faxes. Essentially they turned people away, protected the fee earners and acted as ‘gatekeepers’ to the firm. That’s alongside some secretarial work that needed doing. Direct dial systems may have relieved them of some call handling, but in essence they have always been over stretched people with no time for anything else because the phone is ringing. Seen as a cost, occasionally difficult to manage or retain the right person, this front of house operation will become a significant problem as we move into a more competitive business environment.
From the client’s point of view, how easy is it for them to contact ‘their solicitor’ about the current or potential matter? It usually goes something like this: a person calls a firm, the call is answered but the receptionist has no time to talk to the client and mostly cannot put the client through to the fee earner because they are busy. Potential client rings off dissatisfied and has to try again later or calls another firm.
Reception has mostly been run on a ‘minimise costs’ approach because it doesn’t generate fees. Now there needs to be an alternative because clients won’t bother to call back or wait. Clients will pick the firm that engages them with a service that deals with them on their terms.
Depending on the size of the firm there needs to be three, four or five people, trained and ready to answer the phone, emails or greet visitors. Each person must have the ability to confidently present the benefits of all the services the firm has to offer and have time to discuss these with the potential client.
Whether you are a single branch firm or spread across a region your firm should have a separate client reception department that is responsible for delivering a satisfactory contact service with the firm. They need to be measured on and have targets for increasing the new matter instructions to the firm.
All that will be seen as increasing costs. However, there are two reasons why this is an imperative change needed for firms. First, many of the new services being offered focus on customer service and immediate engagement with the client. That is, providing the client with substantive assistance so they have no need to go anywhere else. Your firm needs to compete with this offering whatever the cost. The second point is that a new reception for clients relieves the fee earners of dealing with non-profitable communications. Fee earners can then spend more time concentrating on current clients and leave the qualification of enquiries to a well trained client receptionist.
And there is more. Once in place the client reception team provides a resource to take more non-fee earning task away from fee earners. They can follow-up costs quotes, make call backs for fee earners, make out-bound past client follow-ups and deal with promotional campaigns or advertising responses. All this adds up to capturing profitable enquiries, dealing effectively with no-matter enquiries, allowing fee earners to concentrate on current matters and a whole host of improved management measurement information.
It need not be a radical change. Firms already have most of this in their current set-up. What makes the difference is re-defining client engagement in a way that suits the client. While the details in each firm may be complicated, a new client reception can be achieved if the partners concentrate on the main issue; capture profitable matter enquiries before your competitors do.
Alastair Moyes is a director at Marketlaw and co-author of Marketing Legal Services, the current marketing handbook from Law Society Publishing.


Comments
Client Receptionist
Mr Moyes does not mention the legal secretary/PA who is more than capable of taking detailed instructions in order to filter profitable new enquiries from the non-profitable and thus shield the fee earner from answering the phone all day. Some of us have been doing this for quite some time! Potential new clients do speak to the secretary and they also have the option of leaving a message on voicemail, which Mr Moyes also does not address. Clients always want immediate attention and this is almost invariably impossible in a busy solicitor's practice. I do agree that first impressions are important but please bear in mind we are not all glorified typists.
Secretaries or PAs are essential
Hello Ms. James,
Thank you for your comments. May I clarify the omission you highlight.
Secretaries, PAs or support staff are an essential part of delivering results to clients. But that is exactly what they need to be doing, working with fee earners on profitable matters. The process I’ve outlined in the article is about efficient and effective pre-sales enquiry handling, before the matter gets to your detailed instruction taking.
As a highly experienced legal PA, may I suggest that you are more valuable to your firm when dealing with profitable clients. Anything that gets in the way of your direct work with clients needs to be handled elsewhere. It’s not that you can’t do it, more a question of should you be doing it?
What I’m attempting to highlight is that firms of all sizes should think about separating new matter/client enquiry handling from current matter work. In a more competitive market, with ABSs and others selling to your firm’s clients, we need to separate the ‘sales’ function from the ‘production’ function.
As for 'drumfada' comments, I am amazed too. My colleague David Monk, with 25 years experience of solicitors marketing occasionally draws this analogy. “Jaguar car’s production director is not the best person to sell their cars and I won’t want to drive a car build with the sales director’s technical knowledge.”
We do not seek to ‘change the landscape’ merely make solicitors the best choice within the landscape as we find it.
It never fails to amaze me
It never fails to amaze me that the less some people actually know about the law the more they claim they can change the landscape.
The landscape isn't going to
The landscape isn't going to change, anymore than the estate agents landscape changed when the banks/insurers bought them all up-then sold them again at a loss.
The plain fact is that much of legal work is not profitable, or barely profitable-certainly not profitable enough for the return outside investors will want/need.
As with all these bright ideas, it is going "live" just when we are in a recession (probably the biggest since the 20/30s) when a service "industry" such as law needs the personal touch an involved owner has-not a detached investor.
It is telling that even the magic circle firms are getting rid of lockstep partners-obviously they are feeling the cold along with the rest of the profession.
The regulation of the ABS's will, of course, be a disaster, just like the FSA has been, despite all the triumphalism emitted from the SRA.
The idea that the UK could be service driven has been shown as the nonsense it always was; the good times were good but they've gone forever. ABS's were postulated on such times; they are now yesterdays vision of tomorrow.
Listen to your calls
People just don't realise what they sound like when they
answer the phone.
They don't listen, they don't ask intelligent questions, they don't even ask the client
to pop in.
They are too busy thinking about the email they are
going to write to the prospect because isn't that what sales is all about? Writing emails......
If someone phones you how do you respond?
Have you got a script that allows you to answer the call
in a "perfect, tested and profitable way"?
So, what's the solution?
Firstly I recommend listening to the calls you
take - (your performance will improve fast)
Secondly make a note of all the things you
do right and wrong. And improve it.
Thirdly, get a script together of what you want to do, how you want to listen, the questions you need answered, what you should say
and how you should maximise the liking, trusting and communicating of the call.
Scripts
As a customer I hate dealing with people who work from a scipt - it reminds me of share dealing scams etc
This just seems an effort to introduce anothern layer of admin/personnel and distance the customer from the solicitor even more.
Legally, the problem present is often not the problem the client actually has and it takes skill and knowledge to work that out.