Let Rome burn - we’re off on holiday!
That noise you can hear is MPs stampeding for the exits. Yes, today is the first day of their summer recess/holiday, just 36 days after their last (three-week) break.
Expect to see a politician pitch up at a dreadful seaside resort near you, smiling for the staycation photo opportunity before fleeing quick as a flash to a Tuscan villa. Our leaders at the good ship Ministry of Justice have left a particularly long to-do list. We had expected announcements on the RTA portal, small claims court and fund of last resort for asbestos disease sufferers (though this was in the hands of the DWP).
But the summer recess came with barely a whisper from MoJ HQ. They probably even forgot to put their out-of-office on. In effect, they have tidied the house before the holiday, but stuffed all the junk under the sofa. None of the unresolved issues has gone away, merely hidden out of sight and left to fester until September.
In politics, ‘twas ever thus. But solicitors cannot afford to wait around for newly-bronzed politicians to make pronouncements from on high. From next April, the legal world will be turned upside down. Cuts to legal aid will take effect, the no win, no fee structure will be radically altered, referral fees will be banned and employer’s and public liability will be shifted into the fast-track claims processing scheme. Each could be a destabilising issue for smaller firms, but collectively it represents a tumultuous upheaval that will require new business plans and staffing changes. By September, firms will have seven months to tear it up and start again - they could do with a little guidance sooner rather than later.
What the MoJ did confirm on Tuesday was the deadline (April 2013, naturally) for extending the RTA portal to include EL and PL and raise the limit to £25,000. Instinct has always suggested these changes are too hasty, coming just two years after the electronic claims system was founded, often with mixed results.
Now there is an expert who agrees - and in a government-commissioned report no less. Word is the MoJ has had Professor Paul Fenn’s assessment of the small claims process on its desk for some time, so the suspicion lingers this was rushed out in time for recess but without the chance for analysis.
Fenn states a whopping 50% of cases drop out of the portal already - and that’s just for RTAs, which are often non-contentious. The nature of PL and EL claims means that many more will shun the process if it’s extended.
Most worringly, Fenn notes that damages have decreased for claimants. This was never part of the deal - indeed insurers were at pains to say they would settle at the same rate in the portal. In eschewing Fenn’s plea for patience, the government is taking the Malcolm Tucker approach to expert advice: ‘you have to know what an expert is going to advise you before he advises you. If not get another one’ (series 2, episode 3 - in my opinion the best yet).
The feeling remains that this department is closed to any opinion but its own. And ministers certainly won’t hear much dissent from wherever they’re spending their summer holidays.
Follow John on Twitter
More News blogs
- AXA says what we all think on referral fees
- Airports: four decades of cancellations is enough
- Bringing back the death penalty
- Judicial tension over costs budgeting
- Britain’s fragile legal legacy
- Facebook and flexible friends
- ‘Going to court was worse than the abuse’
- Our only certainty is uncertainty
- UKIP’s law and justice policy
- Lord Judge and eternal vigilance
- A blow to EL claims
- SRA right to raid compensation fund - for now at least
- The yes and no of Scottish independence
- APIL can celebrate survival, if little else
- Grayling achieves the impossible
- Rise in small-claims limit may be good for litigants
- The problem with the language judges use
- Criminal legal aid: what now?
- Has ending compulsory retirement been good?
- Insurers use referral fee ban to feather their own nests
- Treatment of whistleblowers
- Police deserve fair play, too
- This judgment is sponsored by Budweiser
- Cruel springtime for justice
- Firms are getting cold feet over DBAs
- Budget fallout: running into a brick wall
- No justice for Zimbabwean campaigner

Comments
Yet again
Yet again, another example of lazy journalism by John Hyde.
You made the same point this time last year - you should accept that MP's have more than one aspect of their jobs. Parliament and constituency.
If your argument is with the parliamentary timetable, rather than MP's then focus your ire accordingly.
Bob "the Scouser" Snelling
Phenomenal blog
Completly agree with the above. Tucker would be ashamed!
Tripe
Tripe tripe tripe!
Great blog
This blog makes lots of good points - flexibility is key to making progress. Makes sense - well done.
Bon Snelling is clearly
Bon Snelling is clearly joking with a grudge to bear.
John H always writes thought-provoking and insightful copy. More of the same please!
Well thought out
Exactly what the public are thinking - how can Parliament continue with this facade?
Who in the legal profession has confidence in the MoJ
Does the lack of prompt action by the MoJ really surprise anyone? Who in the legal profession really has any more confidence that the MoJ will do a better job than, for example, the SRA did with the “My SRA” disaster. In the words of a colleague, "it took me longer to register on my SRA than it took to deliver my first child”. The MoJ is no better.