- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Time for the silk cut?
Wednesday 29 February 2012 by Catherine Baksi
2012 - 0/2
Since the Queen's Counsel selection panel replaced the more secretive machinations of the Lord Chancellor for the appointment of silks, only 11 of the 714 who have received the accolade have been solicitors.
One of the reasons why so few are appointed is because comparatively few apply in the first place. Following this week’s announcement of the latest round of appointments, the chair of the selection panel Dame Joan Higgins said: ‘The panel is concerned that there appears to be considerable hesitancy on the part of solicitor advocates to apply for silk, even where they may be well qualified to do so.’
Here are the statistics for the number of solicitors who applied and the number who were successful:
2012 - 0/2
2011 - 2/5
2010 - 1/10
2009 - 3/4
2008 - 1/6
2006 - 4/12
In the past the Law Society has felt that the rank of QC was somewhat archaic and unnecessary. But Chancery Lane’s view seems to have shifted. Hearing of the latest results Law Society president John Wotton expressed his disappointment, but said he was ‘convinced’ solicitors have much to offer in the role and encouraged more to apply. There was no call for the accolade, which recognises excellence in advocacy, to be abandoned.
Wotton’s stance is markedly different from that of the former president Fiona Woolf, who in an interview with the Gazette in 2006 following the announcement of the first cohort of silks appointed under the new regime said: ‘I’m not sure I would perpetuate a QC system. I would go down the route of specialist accreditation.’
Six years on, with the opening of the legal market and the focus on public or consumer interest, specialist accreditation schemes are certainly growing in visibility.
The Crown Prosecution Service has an accreditation scheme for its advocates and the spectre of the controversial Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates looms on the horizon to rank those doing publicly funded work, beginning with those working in crime.
So, in this new world, does silk serve a purpose for the consumer of legal services - or merely to congratulate those who have excelled at what they do? While congratulations must be given to those who made the grade, has the mark of silk had its day?
- Woolwich, crime and mental health
- Privatising the courts
- ‘Christmas tree’ bills
- AXA says what we all think on referral fees
- Airports: four decades of cancellations is enough
- Bringing back the death penalty
- Judicial tension over costs budgeting
- Britain’s fragile legal legacy
- Facebook and flexible friends
- ‘Going to court was worse than the abuse’
- Our only certainty is uncertainty
- UKIP’s law and justice policy
- Lord Judge and eternal vigilance
- A blow to EL claims
- SRA right to raid compensation fund - for now at least
- The yes and no of Scottish independence
- APIL can celebrate survival, if little else
- Grayling achieves the impossible
- Rise in small-claims limit may be good for litigants
- The problem with the language judges use
- Criminal legal aid: what now?
- Has ending compulsory retirement been good?
- Insurers use referral fee ban to feather their own nests
- Treatment of whistleblowers
- Police deserve fair play, too
- This judgment is sponsored by Budweiser
- Cruel springtime for justice
- Firms are getting cold feet over DBAs