Why the timidity around billing?
In the current economic environment, law firms, like other businesses, are keeping a close eye on cashflow. This is always a particular concern for professional firms, who are rarely paid up front for their services.
Yet, billing is a matter where few firms are as good as they would like to be, or need to be. Many partners are reticent about first billing, and then about chasing payment.
Typical reasons given include variants on the following:
- The belief that they will get a better recovery if they wait;
- The client is going through a difficult period – we need to support them;
- A previous bill has not yet been paid;
- The client will use a different firm in the future if chased; and
- The project is not yet finished.
Partners who say each of the above don’t believe they are making excuses – they believe each reason. But some managing partners and finance directors who have looked closely at these obstacles to payment insist that many of them do not stand up to close scrutiny.
Of course, discovering which are wrong has to begin with direct conversations with clients. But the following findings have a ring of credibility to them:
- Clients are less likely to query, and more likely to pay, a bill they receive soon after completing a transaction – after all, they are on a high from a transaction or winning a case;
- Receiving this bill may prompt them to pay the previous one;
- Regular billing may actually be better for their cashflow than one large bill; and
- Calling to check a client is happy with the bill is a chance to ask them what other matters they have coming up.
Particular exceptions, where the time-to-payment genuinely cannot be reduced tend to include matters such as divorce cases, where the client can pay only when assets or income to which they are entitled are bound up in the case.
Outside of these exceptions, the reason to tackle this issue is obvious. As one managing partner recalls telling a partner, ‘I can’t pay staff using work-in-progress’.
- Visit the Gazette's blogs page for more In Business blogs


Comments
And less complaints -- it's a no-brainer
You are absolutely right. However in our experience not only are clients less likely to query a bill they receive soon after completing a transaction – sending in one bill at the end of the case, or worse still months after the case ends, is much more likely to produce a client complaint, justified or otherwise, than providing a series of smaller bills regularly throughout the case. Happier clients, better cash flow and less complaints -- it's a no-brainer.
Set out your stall
Talking about money right at the beginning of the relationship can also help to make it easier extracting it from them upon billing.
Additionally, architects are very good at phased billing - solicitors are increasingly doing the same.
Many clients may not know that most firms bill long after the action has been completed. So you may get less resistance at the first client meeting than you might expect when floating the idea of phased payment.
no estimates.... no notice of increase fees....
Recent dealings...
Original estimate 2k, final bill 7k, not one revised estimate was given, also there were two fee hikes in that time period again no notice given.
Also they didnt issue a single invoice during the time that vat was at 15% , instead they 'saved' up all the work during that time and issued it once the vat had returned to 17.5%...so some 9 months between invoices. Previous invoices has come every 1-2 months. Do you think they pay a flat rate of tax and get to keep a percentage of the vat collected? I think they do!
You wonder why you have problems getting your clients to pay.
.... and rightly so in your
.... and rightly so in your case. Dont let that put you off the profession on the whole though. Most of us keep our clients fully informed.
You are absolutely right but
You are absolutely right but what is the solution to this? Will look forward to your future posts regarding the solution.
monclerjacket store Discount
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">