Why the world's favourite encyclopedia matters
Our article on the top 50 firms and their patchy use of the online resource Wikipedia was huge fun to research, and a little disturbing too.
I’m not going to defend Wikipedia; that’s not my job. But I use it – I don’t use it and nothing else, don’t worry – and I think it’s great. I also think that a lot of people do rely, or even over rely, on it and those people are likely to be younger – in other words, your future trainees and clients. If they rely on it, it behoves us to make sure it’s as right as it can be, if any of us are allowed to change it, which is the case. So why so many law firms either have poor or non-existent entries baffled me.
However, before I started chucking stones I of course made sure I wasn’t standing in a house made from glass – so I did the Gazette a whole new Wikipedia entry, too. This took a little longer than I expected, and I reckon the process I went through would be useful to you if you’re making your own firm’s entry, which I of course think you should.
First, tell people you’re doing it. Let them know and find out if there is an entry already, who might have written it, and why it is how it is, then say why you’re improving it. You will need to set up a Wikipedia account.
Second, look at the page of a law firm with a good page – that’s why I did the article, really. Log in, go to a page you like, and then click ‘edit’ – and look at how to make a databox and the like. Read Wikipedia's very straightforward ‘how to’ pieces on making pages. Get someone else to check it.
Third, get several people to contribute to the entry, and make sure they or another person goes through your page and makes it as impersonal and factual and ‘straight’ as possible. Wikipedia loves ‘straight’ talk, and so do its readers. They both hate marketing-speak.
Fourth, check up on it on a monthly basis. Don’t forget. You will probably never need to do anything to it, unless you want to improve or change it for good reason. But if someone abuses it, or Wikipedia flags it, you should deal with that, quickly.
Simple, isn’t it? It’s free, it’s (reasonably) easy, and it reaches millions of people. So why aren’t you using it?
More In Business blog
- Law firms’ marketing plans
- Support for deaf clients
- The Tyco-Eversheds deal – from whiteboard to renewal
- PCT: reverse psychology
- Law firm marketing essentials
- The benefits of IT forums
- Alumni networks make sense
- To hear is to obey
- Pro bono and volunteering
- Jackson – an overview
- The intervention dilemma

Comments
I've got more important
I've got more important things to do than learn how to write a Wikipedia entry, Gazette! None of my clients will think more of me because of my Wikipedia entry, and if I told any of them that I was doing that rather than work for them or networking on behalf of the firm, they'd likely think less of me. However, of course this is a good idea if one is trying to attract this year's (well, next year's) graduate intake I suppose.
When I want to know
When I want to know something, whether it's about a living person, a period in history or a firm of solicitors, I search Wikipedia first. Choosing not to have a Wikipedia entry when your firm is notable enough to warrant one (and not every firm will meet the requirements) is akin to choosing not to have a company website, or not caring about your Google ranking. It will not change your relationship with your existing clients, true enough. It will, however, discourage any potential new clients. Increasingly, people turn to the internet to conduct research before making decisions, and a firm that has a Wikipedia article (even a "warts and all" one) will attract more business than one that appears not to even rate a mention in the world's most popular encyclopedia.
Wikipedia links
One advantage to doing a Wikipedia page is the link to your firm's website. It can add to your search engine ranking. In writing an entry it does also make firms think of how they present themselves to the public and clients so there can be an additional benefit there too.
Wikipedia does not improve google ranking
Actually this is not entirely true - a Wikipedia link will not add to your search engine ranking. Wikipedia adds automatic 'nofollow' tags to all outbound links. In basic terms, nofollow means that search engines will not associate the link with the target site. Wikipedia does this is to prevent spamdex-happy marketers adding links all over the place.
Find out more here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nofollow
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamdex
However, although having no obvious ranking benefits, most website owners, when checking their stats, will probably find that their Wikipedia entry provides a considerable number of new site visitors.
Wikipedia entries
Funny anonymous has time to write a comment on this page but not enough time to promote his legal firm......Shame he can't tie in his Wikipedia entry with his newsletter on reputation law and what to do if someone libels you online and protecting yourself etc. This would make a nice link and valuable information for his clietns and prospects............http:///www.greatlegalmarketing.co.uk