ID cards: paranoia or well-founded fear?

Tuesday 01 September 2009 by Jonathan Rayner

Surveillance cameras, credit checks, bank and credit card statements, supermarket loyalty cards, annual appraisals, HR records, school reports, the council poking through your rubbish bags to see if you’re recycling stuff, the nosy neighbour peeking from behind net curtains. Do you ever get the feeling you’re being watched?

Don’t worry: you are not alone. Around 11 million others, according to campaigning group NO2ID, are about to join you as the Big Brother state takes another giant lurch forward.

We are talking here about ID cards, along with DNA databases, fingerprinting and all the other information about you that, defenders of ID cards say, you shouldn’t mind the government holding - unless you have something to hide. After all, ID cards are the solution to global terrorism, child abuse, the mistreatment of vulnerable adults and every other social ill you can imagine. Who can argue with that?

‘We can!’ chorus the campaigners against ID cards. They go on to list the government’s abysmal record for losing confidential data; once it has its ID database, what’s to stop it losing that, too? The 9/11 hijackers and the Madrid bombers, they add, had ID cards, but the authorities didn’t manage to stop them. It’s all a plot, a conspiracy to control our every waking moment and restrict our civil liberties, human rights and dignity as free human beings.

Those are the well-rehearsed battlelines, but now NO2ID has thrown a new ingredient into the conspiracy theorists’ stew. It’s called the Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) and it may, NO2ID claims, soon be keeping tabs on around 11 million workers and volunteers who spend time – or are applying to spend time - with children and vulnerable adults. These workers and volunteers include, to pick some at random, nurses, doctors, gardeners in care homes, carpark attendants at hospitals, parents running their child’s football team, junior tennis coaches, Brown Owl of the local Brownies, prison officers and school dinner ladies.

Who are the ISA? The ISA arose from recommendations made by Sir Michael Bichard in his inquiry into the Soham murders, when a suspected sex offender was able to find employment in a school and go on to kill two children despite the usual Criminal Records Bureau (CRB) checks being carried out. The ISA’s role, therefore, is to enhance CRB checks so as to stop another Soham tragedy.

It aims to achieve this, according to the ISA website, by cutting red tape and ensuring all relevant bodies – such as the police, social and probation services – share information. Workers and volunteers must register with the ISA and it is now a criminal offence even to apply to work or volunteer with vulnerable groups if you have already been barred from doing so.

This is all entirely laudable and above board and all right-thinking people must wish them success in their endeavour. There is not a squeak on the website about sinister government plans to control our lives with intrusive data collection and retention.

Phil Booth, national coordinator of NO2ID, says: ‘That’s where you’re wrong. The only way the ISA can possibly keep tabs on 11 million people is to have the workers and volunteers fingerprinted and made to obtain a national ID card. This is entirely consistent with the various forms of coercion strategy they [the Home Office] have been working on to create so-called volunteers for ID cards.’

Is this paranoia or well-founded fear? I would tell you my opinion, except you just never know who might be listening.

Comments

Are we at war with an enemy

Are we at war with an enemy threatening our home turf ? No ! No bombings here have emanated from Afghan citizens and those responsible for 9/11 were Saudis. Did we need ID cards during IRA attacks which included explosions at the Old Bailey and the Palace of Westminster ? No ! Have ID cards in France and Germany cut their crime rates ? No ! Why waste such a monumental amount of money on making us less free ? Only the spin doctors know the answer....

Well Said

The Identity & Passport Sevice claims that ID cards and their supporting database are only a waste of £4.95 billion, much of which they will recoup for the government by charging us more for our passports.
These are Home Office figures. The same Home Office insisted the NHS database would cost only £2.5 billion. It has cost £12 billion so far and still does not work.
The London School of Economics estimates that the true waste of money on the ID card scheme will be £20 billion, a far more believable sum from a far more believable source.
Far from 'rolling out' ID cards over the next ten years as the Passport Office dreams, they will be scrapped next year immediately after the general election. The Passport Office really should find something else on which to waste our money.

ID cards and the database must be stopped

I would be very interested to hear your opinion Mr Rayner. My opinion is that this profiling and surveillance system must be stopped. There is no way I will allow the state to create biometric profiles on me for the following reasons:

- I manage my identity not the state. It is a massive infringement of privacy which is not proportionate in a democratic society. Isn't it also obvious that if biometric registration for the database becomes the only means of opening bank accounts/taking out student loans/traveling/claiming benefits/getting medical treatment then the power of the state would be monumental. If 'something' were to happen to your card or database entry you would be a non-entity incapable of functioning in this country.

- The ID Cards Act and the various draft orders allow for a wide variety of public bodies to access our profiles without our knowledge let alone consent and enforce a life long reporting obligation to the state on pain of fines of up to £1,000.

- There is no convincing reason for their implementation. Every reason provided has been debunked.

- Following on from the last point, if you are not convinced about the reasons being put forward you then have to question whether they honestly believe what they are saying about the scheme or whether there is a true purpose which we are not being told. I happen to think that Labour are not honest about the true purpose behind the scheme as it clearly encompasses surveillance aspects as it logs every use to which information is put and with whom. The police have also been putting out EU tender notices for handheld 'Mobile identification devices' this week:

http://tinyurl.com/lfzrkm

Anyone with an ounce of foresight can see that such devices envisage biometric profiles being held on a substantial number of people. Convenient that 'voluntary' ID registration will provide this isn't it? The two fit together nicely.

- There is no evidence to suggest the government is capable of looking after this most valuable of personal information.

- Putting all our valuable personal information in one place is folly. It will be a gold mine for identity thieves and wayward employees.

- The scheme is based on substandard technology that has already been hacked.

- They have no intention of making them voluntary. What they mean by voluntary is making it so difficult to lead a normal life that you give up and get one. I don't call requiring registration for a passport/student loan as 'voluntary' uptake. Do you?

- The scheme will cost billions which can be better put to other uses.

http://www.no2id.net/

The Law Society must never allow itself to be seduced by the national identity register scheme (of which id cards are just the tip of the iceberg) and must never allow the practising certificate to become a 'designated document' requiring 'voluntary' registration on the national identity register. Please go to http://www.no2id.net/

http://www.no2id.net/

Bear in mind too, that under the ID card legislation, the cards are the property of the Home Secretary, who can have them confiscated at any time. So, if you're inconvenient, you can become a 'non-person' instantly.

Passports aren't voluntary for ex-pats

The government appears to want us to believe that getting a passport is a luxury we can do without, when it makes the ID card a prerequisite of getting a passport yet calls ID cards "voluntary". As an expatriate obliged to obtain a work permit every five years, for which I need a valid passport, I am acutely aware that my passport is emphatically not a luxury: it is a necessity. Consequently, linking it to any bureaucratic obligation makes the last compulsory.

I'm fairly sure Magna Carta made some promises to allow people to come and go freely, without requiring citizens to establish their identity. Yet government regulations now oblige those who would transport us out of the country to establish our identity as a prerequisite of travel; thus, what the government has no business doing it obliges someone else to do.

Magna Carta

Pretty certain Magna Carta says no such thing. Point 42 talks about freedom to leave and return, but it doesn't mention anything about not requiring people to prove who they are.

ID Cards and Designated Documents

Passports are probably just the first important document that will require us to obtain an ID card. I count myself fortunate that, having been born in Northern Ireland, I am entitled to an Irish passport - and if this whole scheme is not scrapped before 2012 I will be applying for one! It's only a matter of time before driving licenses and any other documents provided by the state will require us to have an ID card before we can apply.