Accused silk in court on VAT fraud charge
A London silk has appeared in court charged with a £600,000 VAT fraud.
Rohan Anthony Pershad QC, who practised from Thirty Nine Essex Street, was summoned to appear at Highbury Corner Magistrates’ Court yesterday.
Pershad faces an allegation that between 1 June 1999 and 24 September 2011 he cheated the public revenue of approximately £600,000. Crown Prosecution Service central fraud division prosecutor Keri Ashworth-Beaumont said: ‘The evidence suggests that he charged and received VAT payments on services he provided whilst practising as a barrister but which he knowingly failed to declare or pay to Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs.’
Pershad is represented by Kingsley Napley partner Angus McBride.
Last week Pershad issued a statement denying ‘any dishonest activity’ in relation to his tax affairs and said he would defend himself ‘vigorously’. Thirty Nine Essex Street said that Pershad had withdrawn his membership of chambers by ‘mutual agreement’ until the resolution of the criminal proceedings.
A statement from the set said: ‘It is not for Thirty Nine Essex Street chambers to comment on the criminal proceedings which are entirely a matter between Mr Pershad and HMRC and will be for the trial process to determine.’
It said the set is ‘fully co-operating’ with HMRC as and when requested to do so. Pershad was called to the bar in 1991 and made a QC in 2011. His practice includes commercial, professional liability and personal injury work.
He will appear before Blackfriars Crown Court on 28 August.
- Neuberger defends judges’ right to speak out on cuts
- HRA applies to soldiers on duty, Supreme Court confirms
- Hundreds face ‘unrated cycle’ as Balva fails
- Consumer panel promises ‘long game’ on will regulation
- Close down CMCs tomorrow - Desmond Hudson
- Wiltshire solicitor’s murderer jailed for 28 years
- Profits squeeze as top-50 firms open results season
- Prison term sought for quoting Society charity report
- Legal aid champion Storer honoured
- Hudson questions SRA’s firm finances disclosure
- Jackson prompts spurt in law firm start-ups
- Legal aid cuts ‘end high-profile BME cases’
- Carbon footprint down 7% in legal sector
- Mystery surrounds legal training report
- Family lawyers divided over Prest decision
- Consumer rights boost welcomed by Society
- Old Bailey offers peek at ‘Dead Man’s Walk’
- Peer-to-peer pioneer
- EC in cartels drive
- Judges could quit over pensions
- Intervention row heads to Strasbourg
- Hunt begins for new SRA chief
- SRA ‘wrong to pursue costs via conduct rules’
- Thousands of court workers to strike on Monday
- RTA claims still high despite referral fee ban
- Law firms warned on debt recovery
- Ombudsman claims wider territory
- SRA puts a price on extra intervention levy