Bailiff checks to be bolted on to Crime and Courts Bill
Bailiffs will be banned from entering homes at night or when there are only children present under new laws proposed by the government today. The Ministry of Justice will also bring in set costs and remove bailiffs’ right to fix their own fees.
The new laws, which will be added to the Crime and Courts Bill, follow a consultation last year on the industry.
Bailiffs will have to undergo mandatory training and a certification scheme, and could be barred if they do not follow the rules.
Justice minister Helen Grant (pictured) said: ‘For too long bailiffs have gone unregulated, allowing a small minority to give the industry a bad name. Too many people in debt have had the additional stress of dealing with aggressive bailiffs who often charge extortionate fees.
‘These new laws will clean up the industry and ensure bailiffs play by the rules or face being prevented from practising. They will also make sure businesses and public bodies can collect their debts fairly.’
Under the new legislation, bailiffs will be allowed to visit debtors only between 6am and 9pm.
Landlords will be banned from using bailiffs to seize property for residential arrears without going to court. Bailiffs will also be trained to recognise vulnerable people, and ensure they get assistance and advice.
The changes will be made by enacting parts of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, and creating new laws through the Crime and Courts Bill, currently in committee stage in parliament.
James Batham, real estate expert at global law firm Eversheds, said: ‘Commercial landlords and tenants should take note that hidden within the government’s pledge today to shake up bailiff regulation is confirmation that the long-anticipated new procedure for commercial rent arrears recovery (CRAR) will definitely be coming into force.
‘The government’s drive to change debt enforcement means that they will be commencing Part 3 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007, which introduces the CRAR system in place of the ancient common law of distress for rent arrears.
‘This is likely to be welcomed by tenants, who will benefit from a 14 day warning before the bailiff turns up at the door, but will be met with less enthusiasm by landlords who face a longer, more costly process.’
News
- Neuberger defends judges’ right to speak out on cuts
- Consumer panel promises ‘long game’ on will regulation
- Close down CMCs tomorrow - Desmond Hudson
- Wiltshire solicitor’s murderer jailed for 28 years
- Profits squeeze as top-50 firms open results season
- Prison term sought for quoting Society charity report
- Legal aid champion Storer honoured
- Hudson questions SRA’s firm finances disclosure
- EC in cartels drive
- Hunt begins for new SRA chief
- Judges could quit over pensions
- Intervention row heads to Strasbourg
- SRA ‘wrong to pursue costs via conduct rules’
- Jackson prompts spurt in law firm start-ups
- Legal aid cuts ‘end high-profile BME cases’
- Carbon footprint down 7% in legal sector
- Mystery surrounds legal training report
- Family lawyers divided over Prest decision
- Consumer rights boost welcomed by Society
- Old Bailey offers peek at ‘Dead Man’s Walk’
- Peer-to-peer pioneer
- Thousands of court workers to strike on Monday
- RTA claims still high despite referral fee ban
- Law firms warned on debt recovery
- Ombudsman claims wider territory
- SRA puts a price on extra intervention levy


Comments
Bailiffs
Good. I know of instances where the bailiffs have given legal advice, told people they need not tell their lawyer and forced neighbours to payon behalf of the debtor! How have they got away with this all this time?!
Now where have I heard this before...?
Bailiffs have had to undergo training for a number of years. It the quality that needs to be monitored.
The guidelines already state the 6-9 rule and if you enforce outside that time the courts will spank you in a misconduct hearing. Ditto vulnerable people.
The courts already have a band of options from reprimanding through ordering training to removal of certificate. Also awarding compensation from the bailiffs bond.
So there is little actually new here merely that now it might be more closely enforced. No one can argue against that. Will they also regulate the big companies as well as the individual bailiffs.
The biggest bugbear for years has been over fees. Responsible people ( in and out of the industry) have agrued for a fixed fee regime. Now perhaps it will be implemented.
I am also not aware of any instance where a residential landlord can bring in bailiffs without a court order. In any event all evictions I have ever been involved with have been by the courts own bailiffs.
Bailiffs AND their friends
I do hope the local police will take note of the regulation and stop acting as de facto bailiffs when summoned to assist a bailiff or summoned by a debtor who's being harassed by bailiffs only to be told by the attending officer they have to let them in when they don't if there's no entry order
'Enacting'?!
"enacting parts of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007"?
Surely: IMPLEMENTING parts of...; the 2007 Act was enacted in, er, 2007.
Baillif acting illegally
I have known of the incident when a friend was at court and the husband had to take call from the children.
Where the bailiff jumped over the fence and knocked at the door. One of the kids got scared and let him in. He started going around the house making a list of items.
Then he told the girl to go and get registration of the car. After that he asked kids for 1,000 and they told him they do not have it.
He asked them to go to the bank and cash the monies and they told him they can not drive. He insisted they go by cab. The husband in the middle of court proceedings spoke to him and bailiff said he will return at 4:00p.m.
After the hearing couple went to the police station and the police officer said bailiff can jump over the high fence.
When the husband rang the council for CT they told the bailiff and he came back again jumping over the fence.
During the conversation also threatened that he knew black belt.
I think his fees was about 60% and the council were getting peanuts.
It is about time the law is getting strict.
Bailiffs
It has to be asked, if bailiffs are so bad, why does the court service rely on them to recover outstanding fines?
If bailiffs are so bad, why are the LSC intending to use them to recover unpaid contributions on Crown Court legal aid orders.
LSC - threateing to use bailiffs ???????
When the relationship between citizen and the state becomes disproportionate, disharmony, distress and any other words using the prefix 'dis'. It is scandalous that the Legal Services Commission is threatening to use bailiffs to recover unpaid contributions on Crown Court legal aid orders, when it (LSC) is itself the rogue debtor. Unpaid fees to firms and disbursement to experts paid as late as three years on high cost cases causes individuals and firms severe financial difficulties.
Late payment legislation is disproportionate to recovery methods such as use of bailiffs. When has the ordinary citizen ever been able to use bailiffs to recover late payments from the LSC or any government agency?
These measures announced,
These measures announced, welcome as they are, will be ineffectual because the Government have refused to appoint a regulator to enforce them...it's not just a question of bailiff powers and legal checks on those powers, its about the total absence of any proper oversight of baliff firms