- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Bill threatens principles of ‘open and natural justice’
A bill before the House of Lords this week threatens the principles of ‘open and natural justice’, the Law Society has warned.
The Justice and Security Bill, which had its second reading in the House of Lords today (19 June), proposes extending closed material procedures (CMP) - or secret trials - to all civil proceedings. The Law Society, in a parliamentary brief, said the bill threatens the principle that allows all parties to see and challenge all evidence relied upon before the court and to combat that evidence by calling evidence of their own.
The Society recognises that there are circumstances where national security demands the confidentiality afforded by a CMP, but there is no evidence that current procedures provide insufficient safeguards, it said.
The Society dismissed government fears that the ‘Norwich Pharmacal’ jurisdiction, which allows the courts to order a person involved in another’s wrongdoing to disclose information, could lead to the disclosure of intelligence provided by allies. The Society said that placing the ‘Norwich Pharmacal’ jurisdiction on a statutory footing, with a detailed statutory definition of the test to be satisfied, would prevent the disclosure of security-sensitive materials under all but the most exceptional circumstances.
The Society added that it is concerned about the wider implications of CMPs on civil litigation and professional ethics, in particular how solicitors can best advise clients when not ‘privy to the information’ being used against them. Solicitors will also be unable to fulfil their ethical duty of providing clients with accurate cost estimates if they cannot assess the weight of opposing evidence, the Society said.
During the bill’s second reading, civil rights campaigning group Liberty held a protest outside the Supreme Court. Liberty director Shami Chakrabarti (pictured) said: ‘The bill replaces judicial discretion with executive control and destroys the age-old principle that everyone is equal under the law.’
- Neuberger defends judges’ right to speak out on cuts
- HRA applies to soldiers on duty, Supreme Court confirms
- Hundreds face ‘unrated cycle’ as Balva fails
- Consumer panel promises ‘long game’ on will regulation
- Close down CMCs tomorrow - Desmond Hudson
- Wiltshire solicitor’s murderer jailed for 28 years
- Profits squeeze as top-50 firms open results season
- Prison term sought for quoting Society charity report
- Legal aid champion Storer honoured
- Hudson questions SRA’s firm finances disclosure
- SRA ‘wrong to pursue costs via conduct rules’
- Jackson prompts spurt in law firm start-ups
- Legal aid cuts ‘end high-profile BME cases’
- Carbon footprint down 7% in legal sector
- Mystery surrounds legal training report
- Family lawyers divided over Prest decision
- Consumer rights boost welcomed by Society
- Old Bailey offers peek at ‘Dead Man’s Walk’
- Peer-to-peer pioneer
- EC in cartels drive
- Judges could quit over pensions
- Intervention row heads to Strasbourg
- Hunt begins for new SRA chief
- Thousands of court workers to strike on Monday
- RTA claims still high despite referral fee ban
- Law firms warned on debt recovery
- Ombudsman claims wider territory
- SRA puts a price on extra intervention levy