Civil justice advisers condemn PI fixed fees as ‘unrealistic’
Fixed-fee proposals for personal injury work are unrealistic and should wait until at least 2014, the Civil Justice Council (CJC) has advised.
The independent advisory body chaired by the master of the rolls has told the government it should hold back from new costs plans before the civil justice reforms have been fully implemented.
The Ministry of Justice is currently working on its final costs report following a consultation that ended on 4 January.
Under the proposals, fixed recoverable costs for RTA claims up to £10,000 could come down from £1,200 to £500 from 1 April.
Claimant groups last week launched a legal challenge to the plan. The CJC’s response will place further pressure on ministers to hold back.
It points out that the costs regime must accurately reflect the actual amount of work that goes into managing a PI claim.
‘The CJC is conscious that solicitors must comply with a number of regulatory guidelines when opening a file, and that it may be regarded as unrealistic to expect all the necessary work and negotiations to be carried out against a fixed fee limited to £10,000.’
The response points out that claims worth less than £10,000 may well prove more complicated than those above that figure. Claims may also start out as relatively low value but become more complex as they progress.
The CJC questions the reduction of fixed costs to reflect expected savings made by PI firms no longer paying referral fees.
‘In order to maintain their profile in the marketplace, which is becoming increasingly competitive not least due to the changes effected by the Legal Services Act 2007, firms are likely to have to increase their marketing costs.
‘This is likely to have an impact on their cost base and ought properly to be reflected in the sums recoverable.’
The CJC recommends a proper revision of the figures should wait until 2014 when evidence has been gathered of the work done in PI claims.
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination