- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Client emails to be evidence in mis-selling claims
Emails between bank staff and owners of small businesses who bought interest-rate hedging contracts will be evidence in mis-selling claims totalling up to £1bn, the Gazette can reveal.
Norton Accord, the company that has secured funds to launch up to 4,000 cases, said that client emails are among the criteria it is using to assess the strength of optional claims.
Meanwhile, claimant lawyers have accused some banks of deploying ‘strong-arm tactics’ against customers who have raised mis-selling of hedging contracts as an issue.
Chris Hale of Bracewell Law, whose firm is advising clients on funded claims arising from hedging contracts, told the Gazette banks were taking a ‘tough line’. ‘Where clients are raising mis-selling as an issue, it seems to be a tactic – banks are not above withdrawing facilities from those customers,’ he said.
Hale also accused the banks of delaying tactics, such as ‘providing transcripts and emails in their possession as late in the process as they can’. The ability to fund cases has been important, he added, where banks might ‘rely on our clients running out of money’.
Paul Crawford, director of Norton Accord, said he expects banks ‘to draw these cases out, but then settle before they reach court’. Norton Accord panel solicitors will issue the first proceedings in the next seven weeks, with each case expected to last 12-18 months.
- Neuberger defends judges’ right to speak out on cuts
- HRA applies to soldiers on duty, Supreme Court confirms
- Hundreds face ‘unrated cycle’ as Balva fails
- Consumer panel promises ‘long game’ on will regulation
- Close down CMCs tomorrow - Desmond Hudson
- Wiltshire solicitor’s murderer jailed for 28 years
- Profits squeeze as top-50 firms open results season
- Prison term sought for quoting Society charity report
- Legal aid champion Storer honoured
- Hudson questions SRA’s firm finances disclosure
- Legal aid cuts ‘end high-profile BME cases’
- Carbon footprint down 7% in legal sector
- Mystery surrounds legal training report
- Family lawyers divided over Prest decision
- Consumer rights boost welcomed by Society
- Old Bailey offers peek at ‘Dead Man’s Walk’
- Peer-to-peer pioneer
- EC in cartels drive
- Judges could quit over pensions
- Intervention row heads to Strasbourg
- Hunt begins for new SRA chief
- SRA ‘wrong to pursue costs via conduct rules’
- Jackson prompts spurt in law firm start-ups
- Thousands of court workers to strike on Monday
- RTA claims still high despite referral fee ban
- Law firms warned on debt recovery
- Ombudsman claims wider territory
- SRA puts a price on extra intervention levy