CPS to go paperless by April, says Starmer
The Director of Public Prosecutions has committed to making the Crown Prosecution Service entirely digital by April 2012.
Keir Starmer QC told a Law Society seminar that the criminal justice system needs to move away from a paper-based system and transform the way criminal cases are handled. By April 2012 digital files will be the ‘currency’ of the CPS, with information passed digitally from the police to the CPS and sent over secure email to the defence.
Internally, he said the CPS would work digitally and put files in a ‘depository’ that could be accessed securely by the defence, the court and the probation service.
Starmer said the move ‘will be the biggest transformational change in a generation’ and bring the criminal justice system up to date with other professions that have already moved away from paper-based systems.
The DPP said the timetable would be ‘challenging’ but the CPS is determined to achieve it by the April deadline. He said: ‘We need to be radical. The challenges facing the criminal justice system provide an opportunity to radically reform the way we deliver criminal justice. We should seize that opportunity.’
Starmer said the CPS is already ‘making great strides’ in its ability to prosecute using technology. He gave examples of the early guilty plea pilot in Liverpool, in which files are made digitally; Winchester Crown court, where evidence is presented on laptops in court; and Dyfed Powys, where advanced information is served electronically.
The former chairman of the Law Society’s criminal law committee, Ian Kelcey, said he accepted the need for increased use of IT, but said: ‘any technology has to work for the defence as well as for the prosecution’.
He raised concerns over the cost of acquiring the necessary equipment; of printing costs being passed on to the defence is prosecution material is served electronically, as well as the difficulties of taking laptops in to prisons and problems with secure email.
Starmer said the CPS is working with the prison service to tackle the issue of taking laptops into prisons and said the CPS had no problem with defence solicitors passing on information to clients via insecure email, with the client’s permission. ‘If we work together it is possible to get through the problems. But we can’t contemplate a system in which we are still a paper-based system in 10, 20 or 30 years time.’
Starmer also said the criminal justice system needs to improve its control of cases that go to court. He said 67-69% of cases in magistrates’ courts and 72-74% of Crown court cases end up with guilty pleas, with 38% of cases listed for trial in the magistrates’ court and 42.5% of cases listed for trial in the Crown court resulting in guilty pleas on the day of trial or shortly before it.
‘That means nearly every other case that had been prepared for trial was prepared unnecessarily because there was no trial. And that has huge ramifications for the police, the CPS and for victims, and is a huge waste,’ he said.
Starmer said: ‘We have set up our courts as trial courts when they are in fact sentencing courts. We need to divide cases into two broad categories - those that are genuinely going to trial, and the vast majority of cases that will not [go to trial].'
Speaking at the same event, the senior presiding judge Lord Justice Goldring said the early guilty plea pilot was going well, with the average time between first appearance and final hearing on average three weeks.
He said the pilot would be reviewed and if it was found to be efficient, he had ‘no doubt that it will be rolled out’.


Comments
What if a jury member wants
What if a jury member wants to check a statement at the same time as viewing CCTV footage? The electronic system won't let them do both at once!
Thus the 'go digital' project may save the DPP a fortune on ink and paper but it passses those costs onto the defence and potentially handicaps jurors into the bargain, it may benefit the DPP but it is not in the interests of justice.
How do you know?
How do you know what the electronic system can or cannot do? Don't you think you should wait and find out how the court system will adapt before passing judgement? As with other solicitors, you are missing the point about going digital - you do not print off things. Paperless means exactly that.
Apologies but some of us are
Apologies but some of us are less inclined to take every pronouncement of the DPP as gospel.
I have never seen a video link operating in an ordinary UK Court which will simultaneuosly display the feed plus documentation.
I would also like assurances that the DPP's system is immune to all known keylogging software to alleviate any concerns that the electronic footprint of a juror's confidential consideration of the evidence is not exploited by either the prosecution, defence, co-defendant - or outside party.
Besides saddling the MoJ with the additional costs of equipping jury rooms with computers, members of the jury - unless technologically savvy - will not be able to make notes upon any statements which go into evidence whilst the trial is in progress or during their retirement.
Missed deadlines
Will their new system allow them to stop missing deadlines like the 6 month deadline missed for an assault charge over Ian Tomlinson's death.
Clever, Clever
No it wont. Nor is it designed to do that. Because electronic systems are not lawyers. It is designed to eliminate the cost of photocopying and postage. But of course you knew that. You just thought you would be clever and post an anti-CPS message.
Nowt wrong with "clever".
"Clever" to be "anti" the CPS ? whatever that means. If you mean most people want an organisation that shows signs of failing to perform its consitutional functions effectively, to improve, you`re correct. Seems like commonsense to me, not even very "clever"....
How about this for clever?
How about this for clever: stay on the topic instead of ranting.
CPS Secure email
There are a number of grounds to be less than happy about this. They are all to do with finance and accessibility of information.
Finance - fee's are paid in the Crown Court on a page count. I don't think this has been resolved. If it has great, if not then the LSC need to come to an agreement with the CPS as to the correlation between electronic pages and real pages.
I can't my laptop or Ipad into the cells so if cases are served on this on the day unless their is a means to access a printer at Court how can i go through things with a client. I have a good memory but can't recall all details to take instructions.
All these things are resolvable with patience and a little understanding.
I don't see the point at having ago about things that the system isn't designed to resolve. However, with less time spent on sorting this kind of paperwork, perhaps the lawyers in the office can deal with the timescales etc
Where to begin?
Where to begin with your post? Perhaps by emphasising the importance of keeping up to date with developments in legal aid?
In relation to page count etc. I quote the new funding regulation:
The Criminal Defence Service (Funding) (Amendment) Order
2011
9. In paragraph 1 of Schedule 1—
(a) in sub-paragraph (1) in the definition of “standard appearance”, after (g) insert—
“(h) a sentencing hearing other than one falling within paragraph 2(1)(b)(ii) or
paragraph 12(1);”;
(b) in sub-paragraph (2), after “but” insert “except as mentioned in sub-paragraph (2A)”; and
(c) after sub-paragraph (2) insert—
“(2A) A document which has existed in paper form and which the prosecution has
converted into digital form to enable service by means of electronic communication is
included within the number of pages of prosecution evidence for the purposes of this
Schedule.”.
In relation to laptops in custody areas:
http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/news/solicitors-can-take-technology-policy-c...
JJ - forgive us for being
JJ - forgive us for being somewhat cynical about payment. The LSC / MOJ will use any means possible to screw us out of money (as the new LAC1 form demonstrates) and therefore before signing up for digital case papers answers need to be confirmed in concrete regarding funding.
Laptops in custody areas: you do realise the ACPO guidance is just that, guidance, and is in no way binding on the police? Besides which, the above poster is not concerned about police stations but rather taking laptops / electronic devices into the cells at Court.
Not to mention taking things into prison which is a real difficulty.
And the big issue of passing on printing costs to us. Bear in mind not all clients especially of course those in custody have laptops to hand to conveniently view all their case papers. The "Access to Justice" scheme in prisons will need to be vastly extended.