‘Cut partner bonuses for diversity failures’
Law firm partners who fail to take ‘robust measures’ to meet diversity targets should be financially penalised, according to a leading pro-diversity group.
A report from the InterLaw Diversity Forum for LGBT Networks argues that the profession remains ‘stuck culturally in the mid-20th century’.
‘Soft’ targets are inadequate, and financial and other incentives are urgently needed to ‘deliver fair career progression’ for women, minority ethnic, disabled, and lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) lawyers.
Successfully meeting targets should be ‘clearly rewarded’ by promotion and other forms of advancement, the report proposes, while the failure of partners and other managers to reach ‘expected standards of behaviour’ should be ‘addressed robustly’ through ‘bonus systems’ and compulsory training, it recommends.
- See the forum's website.
News
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS
- Grayling says no to regulating will-writing
- Society and bar join hands against criminal justice plans
- 100 jobs at risk as BLP seeks 15% salary cost cut
- Bar Council picks a former mandarin
- 30 to meet Grayling in legal aid crisis talks
- Shadow minister hints at ‘unwind’ of Jackson reforms
- Legal education move by embattled Co-op
- Government ‘ignoring’ calls for further RTA review
- Immigration clampdown ‘danger’ to legal sector
- Fiji rule of law report found in contempt
- ‘Don’t ditch quality,’ says Desmond Hudson
- Wragge & Co takes axe to legal support jobs
- Call for solicitors to use British Sign Language
- Foreign case influx at commercial court
- Government red tape reverse
- Sri Lanka relents on visit

Comments
diversity
Shouldnt career progression be on merit rather than on social grounds?
setting targets
I am part of an ethnic minority but could not agree less with diversity targets. It should all be about having a fair chance not about achieving diversity. I always failed to understand why firms do not have a robust approach about skills and intellect and are more concerned either with background or achieving targets based on numbers? The business sense should prevail not the Oxbridge label or some statistical report.