Damages uplift ruling sparks call for clarity
Lawyers have called for extra guidance after claiming a judicial announcement on damages raises more questions than answers.
The Court of Appeal last week handed down a judgment that will lead to a 10% increase in general damages in most civil cases from 1 April next year. But both claimant and defendant solicitors say the judgment could unbalance the system.
Kerry Underwood, chairman of national firm Underwoods, said large numbers of claimants will effectively receive a ‘bonus’ as cases come to court after 1 April that are already subject to recoverable success fees. ‘Thus they will get the 10% increase but will not have to pay any success fee out of it,’ Underwood said.
He added that there were also issues in relation to part 36 offers to settle.
‘Supposing a claimant now offers £10,000 and a defendant £9,500 and in April 2013 the court awards £9,200, uprated by 10% to £10,120. Has the claimant beaten its own offer, thus qualifying for indemnity costs, or has the claimant failed to beat the defendant’s offer, thus incurring liability for all of the defendant’s costs, from 21 days after the claimant’s offer?’
Don Clarke, president of the Forum of Insurance Lawyers, said members were concerned that the judgment was announced in isolation.
‘This reform is part of an interlocking package and closely aligned to the withdrawal of the recoverability of success fees and after the event premiums.
‘It would be illogical not to do everything possible to ensure that, as much as is reasonably practicable, the 10% increase and the withdrawal [of recoverability] are synchronised.’
A spokesman for the judiciary said it was clear from the wording of the judgment that ‘no approach was going to be perfect’. He said judges will be trained in the runup to next April so they are aware of any case being dragged out to a point where damages are increased.
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS