- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Damages uplift ‘will cost defendants £300m’
Insurers told the High Court today that defendants stand to lose more than £300m if claimants are given the ‘windfall’ of a risk-free rise in damages.
The Association of British Insurers (ABI) was arguing its case for an amendment to rules that will enforce a 10% uplift on general damages for all personal injury cases from 1 April 2013. The Court of Appeal used the case of Simmons v Castle in July to impose the uplift, but lord chief justice Lord Judge, the master of the rolls Lord Neuberger and the vice president of the CoA Sir Anthony May later agreed to hear arguments for an amendment.
The ABI said it accepted the uplift – a key element of Lord Justice Jackson’s review of civil litigation costs – in principle, but argued it should not apply to claimants already benefiting from conditional fee agreements.
Timothy Dutton QC, representing the ABI, said up to one million cases could be left in the pipeline by the end of March, costing organisations such as the NHS millions of pounds.
‘One would be in the position if these stand unchanged that there will be a very significant impact on these cases, where claimants will recover costs, success fees and after-the-event insurance as well as receive an extra 10% in damages.’
Describing the potential for a ‘misalignment’ in costs for defendants, Dutton also suggested the existing ruling could lead to ‘behavioural issues’ among some claimant solicitors.
When asked by Neuberger if this meant PI solicitors would advise clients to delay settlement until after 1 April, he agreed. Lord Judge had told a packed courtroom at the start of proceedings that the original judgment was ‘open to reconsideration’.
The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers told the panel of judges that damages were already too low, and that the uplift was intended to address this problem, rather than offset the changes to CFAs.
A decision is expected within days.
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS