- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Don’t cut corners, LeO warns firms
Competition from new market entrants is forcing law firms to offer services and prices they cannot hope to deliver, according to the Legal Ombudsman. In his second annual report, Adam Sampson (pictured) raises concerns that under-pressure firms are cutting corners and making unrealistic promises.
He also warns of a potentially ‘disastrous’ risk of a legal sector equivalent of recent mis-selling scandals.
Sampson says there is no threat to professional ethics from new entrants to the legal market – but that existing firms offering fixed fees must be monitored in case ‘cheap and cheerful tend into cheap and shoddy’.
‘Fixed pricing in legal services is not always possible,’ he says.
Price competition is also forcing firms to consider commoditisation and using less qualified individuals, or IT systems, to complete transactions.
Sampson said this was risky, not least because of the unreliability of automated systems and the different nature of individual cases, and service sometimes falls short of what consumers expect.
Sampson said there have been a number of complaints from customers who lost money on unrealistic no win, no fee promises or confusing legal insurance policies.
According to a poll commissioned by the ombudsman 74% of people do not know what financial cover their legal expenses insurance policy provides.
He said the arrival of new commercial products is to be celebrated but warned it would be ‘disastrous’ if the legal sector was exposed to the risk of its own version of the banking sector’s payment protection insurance scandal.
During the last financial year, the Legal Ombudsman’s Office undertook around 8,400 investigations from the 75,000 enquiries that were lodged.
These resulted in 7,455 cases resolved, 18% of which related to family law, 15% to conveyancing and 12% to wills and probate.
The office cost £17.3m last year to run – lower than the £19.7m budget – and was paid for through Ministry of Justice funding, practising fee levies and charges made against firms subject to three or more investigations.
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- PI firm turns to fixed-price mediation for post-Jackson world
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west PI paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS
- Grayling says no to regulating will-writing
- Society and bar join hands against criminal justice plans
- 100 jobs at risk as BLP seeks 15% salary cost cut
- Bar Council picks a former mandarin