Don’t force accident victims to be speculators - APIL
Seriously injured victims should not have to invest in volatile stock markets to ensure they can fund their future care, claimant lawyers said yesterday.
The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers is lobbying the government to reduce the discount rate, the percentage deducted from the damages of injured people. The rate has been set at 2.5% since 2001 to reflect potential profits that can be made from investing the money.
The figure is based on yields generated by index-linked government stock (ILGS). Insurers want the rate calculated on a mixed portfolio of investments.
APIL president Karl Tonks (pictured) said a wrong calculation could leave people who need lifelong care hundreds of thousands of pounds short of the funds they need.
‘It is simply unacceptable and inconceivable that a vulnerable, injured person, who needs every penny of his damages to work hard for his future, should be forced to take the same risks as a speculative investor,’ he said.
‘The government must change the discount rate as a matter of urgency to stop people being under-compensated, and the rate must be based on low-risk government stock.’
But City firm Kennedys, which represents defendants, said claimants already put their damages into a mixed portfolio of investments and the discount rate should be set to reflect that.
Partner Christopher Malla said: ‘To assume a claimant only invests in ILGS is to ignore what actually takes place and this could overcompensate the claimant.
‘Ultimately this could lead to higher costs for defendant bodies, such as the NHS and local authorities, and have a detrimental impact on already reduced public sector budgets.’
The Ministry of Justice consultation on the discount rate closes today, with a decision expected in the new year.
- Profits squeeze as top-50 firms open results season
- Legal aid champion Storer honoured
- Hudson questions SRA’s firm finances disclosure
- Hunt begins for new SRA chief
- Peer-to-peer pioneer
- EC in cartels drive
- Judges could quit over pensions
- Intervention row heads to Strasbourg
- SRA ‘wrong to pursue costs via conduct rules’
- Jackson prompts spurt in law firm start-ups
- Legal aid cuts ‘end high-profile BME cases’
- Carbon footprint down 7% in legal sector
- Mystery surrounds legal training report
- Family lawyers divided over Prest decision
- Consumer rights boost welcomed by Society
- Old Bailey offers peek at ‘Dead Man’s Walk’
- Thousands of court workers to strike on Monday
- RTA claims still high despite referral fee ban
- Law firms warned on debt recovery
- Ombudsman claims wider territory
- Exclusive: top judges compound Grayling’s PCT woes
- Supreme Court allows appeal in Prest v Petrodel
- Retreat is not an option, says Legal Services Board
- 30 high-impact firms in ‘serious financial difficulty’
- Mass arrest of lawyers in Istanbul protests
- SRA puts a price on extra intervention levy
- Juniors ‘on £14 a day’ after legal aid cuts, MPs hear
- Claims management ‘list of shame’ to go online