- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Employment lawyers slam ‘out-of-the-blue’ reform plans
A group representing 6,000 employment lawyers has savaged government plans to cut red tape for businesses, claiming that they will prolong rather than settle disputes and stretch resources ‘beyond breaking point’.
The Employment Lawyers Association (ELA) says that the proposals, in the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill, have not been fully thought through and, far from simplifying employment law, will confuse employers and employees alike. The Law Society’s Employment Law Committee has also criticised the government’s plans for adding ‘complexity’ to disputes.
The ELA is particularly concerned by plans to cap the compensatory award for unfair dismissal, which it says came ‘out of the blue’. In its response to a Department for Business Innovations and Skills call for evidence on the bill, which closed last week, the ELA said: ‘ELA foresees confusion, greater cause for argument and the potential that claimants pursue discrimination or whistleblowing claims, where no cap applies, instead of unfair dismissal claims.’ It added: ‘The current cap is rarely reached, so why make changes?’
The ELA is also concerned that the bill does not clearly define the type of ‘aggravating factor’ that will allow employment tribunals to impose financial penalties on employers. The ELA said: ‘By introducing yet another factor into a settlement negotiation, disputes would drag on rather than settle, the reverse of what the government is trying to achieve in its draft bill.’
Plans to compel parties in an employment dispute to seek pre-claim conciliation by ACAS is ‘likely to stretch [ACAS’s] resources beyond breaking point and result in the scheme becoming less workable’, the ELA said.
The Law Society committee echoed the ELA’s concerns, in particular calling for ACAS to be ‘adequately resourced and its role clearly defined’ and repeating its opposition to placing a cap on compensatory awards for unfair dismissal.
Commenting on plans in the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill to allow ‘legal officers’ to determine some types of employment tribunal claims, the Law Society committee said that more work must be done to decide the fees payable and the level of qualification required.
- LETR ‘delayed by regulators’
- UK turns back on EU justice project
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals