- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
European court in judicial selection crisis
Thursday 19 July 2012 by Jonathan Rayner
The crisis in Europe’s top court was set to escalate this week, with the 27 EU member states arguing over how to select 12 more judges to help handle a mounting caseload.
The president of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), which is made up of senior judges from each of the 27 member states, wrote earlier this year to the presidents of the European parliament and the Council of the European Union proposing reforms which included appointing 12 more judges to its Grand Chamber.
The CJEU rules in disputes about EU treaties and other EU legislation, and the Grand Chamber hears its most sensitive cases. The CJEU’s decisions are binding on EU institutions and member states. The court has been unable to keep pace with the volume of cases appearing before it, however, not least because 12 more states have acceded to the EU since the CJEU was established in 2003. At the end of 2010 it had 1,300 cases pending.
Its appeal for more judges has been delayed following a European parliament meeting this month at which the member states failed to agree which of them would provide the judges. In his Gazette blog, Jonathan Goldsmith, secretary general of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe, blamed governments putting ‘national interests before European ones’.
A Law Society spokesperson said that the ‘momentum for reform of the court’ is crucial and should not be lost. She said: ‘While the Society suggests that the creation of a tribunal to deal with intellectual property cases would be a more effective way of dealing with the problems faced by the court, the Society also believes there would be clear advantages to adding more judges to the bench.’
Europe minister David Lidington MP said he backed plans to send more judges to the court’s Grand Chamber.
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS
- Grayling says no to regulating will-writing
- Society and bar join hands against criminal justice plans
- 100 jobs at risk as BLP seeks 15% salary cost cut
- Bar Council picks a former mandarin
- 30 to meet Grayling in legal aid crisis talks
- Shadow minister hints at ‘unwind’ of Jackson reforms
- Legal education move by embattled Co-op
- Government ‘ignoring’ calls for further RTA review
- ‘Don’t ditch quality,’ says Desmond Hudson
- Wragge & Co takes axe to legal support jobs
- Call for solicitors to use British Sign Language
- Foreign case influx at commercial court
- Government red tape reverse
- Sri Lanka relents on visit
- Immigration clampdown ‘danger’ to legal sector
- Fiji rule of law report found in contempt