Family bar chief calls for divorce law reform
Divorce laws should be reformed to provide a default regime for the division of assets when relationships break down, the chief of the family bar has suggested.
Nicholas Cusworth QC (pictured), chair of the Family Law Bar Association, told the Gazette that greater certainty over the division of property and assets would cut the number of couples going to court.
He favoured a regime of ‘community of marital property’, under which all assets, except inheritances, gained during a marriage are presumed to be jointly owned and are divided upon divorce.
At present, he said, ‘divorce law works in favour of the lawyers’ because the lack of rules encourages parties to go to court.
If parties do not want to be bound by the rules, Cusworth said, they should make a prenuptial agreement. ‘With the high divorce rate, pre-nups should be endemic unless people are happy to pay divorce lawyers,’ he said.
Cusworth also favoured a move towards a more inquisitorial system for resolving family law disputes, branding the current adversarial system ‘not helpful for families’.
His ideas were prompted by pressures on the family justice system, which he said are ‘bringing [the system] to its knees’. Over the next two years the combination of legal aid cuts, increased numbers of litigants in person, family court modernisation and government targets will result in a ‘perfect storm’.
Noting the widening division that the legal aid cuts will create, Cusworth said: ‘At one end of the scale there will be people paying lawyers large sums of money; and at the other end there will be people unrepresented. It’s a recipe for absolute disaster.’
News
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals

Comments
Private Family Law
The same starting point should also apply to children post separation. Too much emphasis is put on material possessions and not enough on the well being of children. They benefit from the love and affection of both parents and the opposition to Shared Parenting legislation is plainly wrong.