Fiji hits back at scathing report

Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum
Thursday 08 March 2012 by Eduardo Reyes

Fiji’s attorney general has launched a personal attack on the author of a report which claimed to expose a serious deterioration in the rule of law in the country.

Aiyaz Sayed-Khaiyum (pictured), the second most powerful member of Fiji’s government, described the report as a ‘joke’ and declared that Nigel Dodds had ‘no integrity’. His comments were reported by the Fiji Broadcasting Corporation and widely circulated to other media.

The report, first revealed in the Gazette, was based on interviews with a wide range of Fiji lawyers conducted during a covert trip by Dodds in November 2011. Dodds, chair of the Law Society Charity and a council member, entered the country on a tourist visa because official visits, including a 2009 delegation proposed by the IBA, had been refused permission to enter Fiji. Sayed-Khaiyum has denied allegations that lawyers opposed to the government are no longer being instructed.

The Gazette, however, has been shown a May 2007 cabinet directive stating that no ­government ministries or statutory bodies should ‘engage the legal services of Munro Leys and Howards’, a firm named in Dodds’ report. Sources in Fiji confirm that the ban remains in place.

The attorney general also denied that the Fijian authorities had imported judges from other jurisdictions, principally Sri Lanka, to replace those it had dismissed.

However, the Commonwealth Lawyers Association has supported Dodds’ findings in this respect, after the report noted the name and position of specific appointments. These included resident magistrate Irani Ganga Wakishta Arachchi, and the recently departed DPP Ayesha Jinasena, both Sri Lankans. The current DPP, Christopher Pryde, is from New Zealand and has also served as solicitor general.

Dodds’ report charts the government’s alleged assaults on the legal profession and the independence of the courts and prosecutors since a 2006 coup, and the assumption of emergency powers in 2009.

A practice direction prevents any court from hearing a legal case against the government.

Since the story broke, copies of the report have been sent on request to the United Nations, legal professionals and diplomats in Fiji’s capital Suva.

Comments

Here's

another side to the story:

http://www.rnzi.com/pages/news.php?op=read&id=66655

Rule of Law

All that matters is fundamental principles. Whether the Fijian citizenry are able to challenge government decisions in a court of law, that you rightly point out they are barred from doing by way of the practice direction. This is also embedded in almost all controversial decrees churned out by the so called Attorney General of Fiji. The only joke is the Fijian AG.

http://www.realfijinews.com/758121357/tony-gates-dodgy-fijian-judiciary-straight-out-of-zimbabwe/

A "Joke"?

I fully concur with the views of Real Fiji (as above).

The joke unfortunately is on the junta. It is always typical (and this is what people in Fiji have to endure without any independent avenues for redress) that when a rebuttal is required, the illegal and treasonous regime resort to personal attacks as if that shelter's Khaiyum and his side-kick Christopher Pryde, from responding articulately and with substance.

Hold your heads up Law Society Charity! Every aspect of your report is correct.

This is yet more muddying of waters by the regime to detract attention away from what truly troubles them at this time ie the release of the RFMF Board of Inquiry report into the involvement of the RFMF in the Coup of 2000 (and horrifying images: http://www.thetorturewatch.com/1/post/2012/03/skeletons-in-the-closet-evidence-in-pictures.html) by former military man, Ratu Tevita Mara, (available here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/83442300 & here: http://www.truthforfiji.com/uploads/8/4/2/3/8423704/20120305-1st_meridian_report_rfmf_opt2_small.pdf).

Lawyers of the Commonwealth in supporting this must pressure Australia to reconsider their "supposed" intent to soften their position where Fiji and the brutal regime are concerned.

Keep The Faith

The Heritage Foundation in

The Heritage Foundation in the U.S. have also come to the same conclusion as the U.K. Law Society Charity.

The foundation in its 2012 report on Fiji stated:

"The quality of the judicial framework has deteriorated considerably, severely hampered by the lack of judicial independence or any strong political will to eradicate corruption. With the judiciary becoming more vulnerable to political interference, corruption has become a serious cause for concern and undermines the foundations for long-term economic development."

"Government actions undermine the judiciary’s independence."

See link: http://www.heritage.org/index/country/fiji
Download PDF: http://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2012/countries/fiji.pdf