Five years on: progress ‘largely static’ towards LSA nirvana
The Legal Services Act has made little difference to standards in the profession, according to a report released today by the Legal Services Board.
The baseline report, published five years since the act, found that indicators such as diversity, quality of service and access to legal services have not shown any improvement.
The report accepted that many of the 17 performance indicators will take more time to show a difference and notes ‘tentative’ positive signs in consumer empowerment, new entrants and developments in branding.
But it concluded that during the period from 2006/07 to 2011/12 the movement towards desired outcomes was ‘largely static’.
On diversity, the report said available data shows entry levels matching the make-up of the population, but there were limitations on career progression for those from black and ethnic minority groups.
When it came to consumer satisfaction, there had been fewer complaints than expected to the new Legal Ombudsman, but this may be because clients are not aware of the procedure.
‘It is difficult to conclude with any confidence that the quality of legal services improved over the 2008/09-2011/12 period,’ added the report.
Confidence in regulators required ‘significant improvement’, despite this being one of the key aspects of the LSA. There has been no major change in the perception of independence of regulation.
When it came to confidence in the law and ethics of the profession, the report again noted a lack of discernable change – not helped by regulators not separating their representative functions from their regulatory role.
News
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- PI firm turns to fixed-price mediation for post-Jackson world
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- French revolution
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west PI paralegal initiative
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS

Comments
So the fact that there are
So the fact that there are fewer complaints than expected is not because we do a better job with our complaints processes, or complaints themselves are lower - no, it's because our poor darling clients still don't know how to complain...
You really couldn't make it up...
Super Regulator
So we have the Super Regulator saying that there has been no discernible change in the ethics of the profession.
What did the LSA expect?
This unnecessary body is part of the muddled policy behind the 2007 Act.
The Act undermined the previous primacy of the Law Society and paradoxically thereby undermined the notional consensus of a single profession.
Placing consumerism at the heart of the Act is a festering canker which emasculates the ethical inclinations of a once united and proud profession.
Golden Age
@voldemort on Thu, 25/10/2012
'emasculates the ethical inclinations of a once united and proud profession.'
Seriously? Please tell us when all lawyers were ever 'united'? When exactly was this Golden Age of mutual love and respect? Presumably in those days all lawyers were terribly nice to each other, had no interest in money, always did the best possible job for the client, etc etc etc.
P.S. why can't lawyers be 'proud' today by focussing on giving clients/customers, i.e. consumers, a good service and value for money? What isn't to be proud of in delivering that?
Golden Rage
Dear Bond
Congratulations on the new movie -I think personally it is the best ever.
Your cynical comments provides graphic evidence of the need for some lawyers to get back to basics and not treat people as if they were buying baked beans.
Your refrence to customers is quite telling
Who has the time to read all
Who has the time to read all this - 110 pages... I started reading it just now and 'boring', 'verbose', 'lofty' came to mind...
I'm always suspicious of anything called 'baseline'.
Real World
Nobody
I heard yesterday at a seminar that in a particular case the learned judge made a witty comment regarding the difference between the deal struck between the parties, and the deal constructed by the lawyers in some parallel universe such latter contract being barely understood by the parties.
Similarly with the LSA ideas emerge with little relevance to the realities of running a modern law firm.
Who will read it?
I will, and I will summarise it for my Bold Legal Group members. Not a plug, just a response to an earlier post.
Read all this self serving
Read all this self serving stuff now.
Stand by for another round of rules and general clobbering.