Insurer refused access to SRA intervention documents
Insurance companies cannot trawl through intervention documents seized by the Solicitors Regulation Authority in the hope of unearthing evidence that would enable them to refuse indemnity, the High Court has ruled.
In Quinn Direct v The Law Society, decided on Friday last week, Justice Peter Smith threw out Quinn’s application to access all the documents held by the SRA after the SRA intervened into a two-partner firm, South Bank Solicitors.
Quinn alleged that monies had been dishonestly and improperly paid from South Bank’s client account, and refused to indemnify one of the partners, Horace Onobrakpeya, for a number of claims brought by lenders. Quinn then applied to the court for access to all intervention documents held by the SRA, saying that it needed access to decide whether or not it was obliged to indemnify Onobrakpeya’s partner, Colin Ikoku, in connection with these claims.
Dismissing Quinn’s application, Smith said: ‘The whole purpose of the present application… is merely an attempt to gather evidence… to enable [Quinn] to refuse an indemnity.’ He said that the SRA could continue providing access to files relating to existing claims, but otherwise, privilege and confidentiality prevented the blanket release of documents.
The allegations against South Bank concerned conveyancing transactions carried out by Onobrakpeya. Claimant lenders alleged that there were discrepancies between the sums of money going into the firm’s client account and the sums paid out from it, and alleged that these transactions were unauthorised and dishonest. In one instance, Onobrakpeya admitted to paying out more than £2.7m in a single transaction, alleging that he did so under threats of violence. Quinn contended that there were a substantial number of other potential claims.
Smith said that Quinn’s assumption that Ikoku knew of Onobrakpeya’s activities ‘is predicated by a false assumption of dishonesty of every partner in a small firm’.
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS