Khan: we’ll be tough on the causes of reoffending
A women’s justice board and a minister to tackle offenders’ mental health problems would be among a Labour government’s plans to fight crime and open a ‘war on reoffending’, the shadow justice secretary told the Labour party conference today.
Sadiq Khan MP said that Labour’s claim to be tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime required efforts to reduce the ‘scandalous’ rate of reoffending, which he said costs £11bn a year. Rehabilitation, he said, is not soft on crime, but ‘tough on reoffending’, which will led to less crime, less victims of crime, safer communities and a cheaper justice system.
Khan highlighted problems of poor education, drug and alcohol dependency and mental health issues faced by many in prison, noting that 70% of prisoners have two or more mental health problems. ‘We’ve replaced the Victorian asylum with the Victorian prison. Festering in prison with serious mental health problems that can and should be treated is morally wrong,’ he said.
He promised that Labour would give a justice minister specific responsibility for rooting out mental health problems in our criminal justice system.
Reducing the number of women in prison was a priority. Khan called the high number of women in prison a ‘disgrace’, saying that 28% had no previous convictions, double that of men. Emulating the success of the youth justice board in halving the number of young people offending for the first time, Khan said that a Labour government will begin the work to look at introducing a women’s justice board, working with women offenders in prisons and probation service.
He said: ‘Targeting specific groups, tailoring an approach to offenders’ unique circumstances, has been shown to work.’
Restorative justice will play a key role. Khan said that under Labour courts will have to consider the option of restorative justice as part of every sentence they hand down. He highlighted evidence from the Prison Reform Trust showing that the restorative justice programme in Northern Ireland had halved reoffending rates.
Addressing the conference after Khan, the shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper MP called for ‘new action and new laws’ to tackle organised, cross-border and financial crime. ‘It’s time to choke off the legal loopholes and choke off organised crime,’ she said.
Cooper contrasted the situation of ordinary people going to court for not paying their TV licence with those who commit multibillion-pound financial crimes and get off scot-free. ‘We need an end to the double standards,’ she said.
Cooper praised the European arrest warrant, which she said had led to 600 suspected criminals being brought back to Britain to face justice. But she said more action is needed to tackle domestic and sexual violence.
‘We need proper minimum standards, backed up a new domestic and sexual violence board starting with rapid action to protect vulnerable children and young people,’ she said.
News
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination

Comments
Labour and Crime
The main problem with New labour was the fetish they had with passing legislation. Reams of paper exist containing new Acts which have not come into effect in whole or in part. They even got to the stage of amending legislation after it was given Royal Assent that had not been given a commencement date.
IPP was perhaps the worst thing that New Labour introduced.
New Labour and the current Government have the same contempt for Solicitors and refuse to engage in a meaningful conversation to address the real problems in the criminal justice system and the real solutions.
Too much effort has been put into Solicitor bashing and too little effort into making Crown Courts work properly. The real reason for this is that too much decison-making is based upon reports and statistics and none based upon sound management techniques such as walking through a system and examining log jams, duplication and unnecessary bureaucracy.
One week of following cases up to the Crown Court from Police Station through Magistrates would allow the Government and ONL (One Nation Labour) and the civil servants the opportunity to properly assess the criminal justice system.
No need for Pilots of daft ideas (eg Sunday Remand Courts) just the ability to walk, the willingness to listen and a pen and paper to make notes.
If Grayling and/or Khan wish to reform the Courts effectively then it can only be done by talking to Solicitors.
Universal Values and the Rule
Universal Values and the Rule of Law
The Mayflower Compact in the US inspired by Magna Carta continued the English notion of law being at the heart of democracy.
Lawyers in the UK also have a critical role to play in reminding politicians and others from time to time that laws ultimately are made by the people for all the people, they are not made to serve the interests of dogmatic class warriors, or vested interests of any other description.
Any discussion of jurisprudence and its application in providing the binding agent for a vibrant democracy should be led by a professional body, empowered by its members, to promote the ethical delivery of legal services as part of a wider celebration of professionalism. Such body would also understand that it is difficult on many occasions to separate the Law from politics
Law is far too important to be contaminated by the unworthy actions of politicians driven by dogma and suffering the corrosive effects of holding a one sided view.
It was all the more shocking and devastating therefore for many solicitors in the lead up to the 2007 Act, that the Law Society should abandon its historical connections with professionalism and be so complicit in damaging the ethical core of the Legal Profession.
The Law Society has much to learn from its cousins in the US in terms of evolving professionalism so as to meet the needs of clients within an ethical framework in the 21st Century.
Lawyers must reignite the passion they once felt when they first went to University to learn about the wonderful principles of law propounded by Master of the Rolls Denning and others.
The Law Society has lost touch with its roots, and has become a body of vested interests obsessed with hitting targets and the slavish adherence to due process, and it is hardly surprising therefore that the profession's image has become so tarnished by default.
The status quo is not acceptable and change is coming
More old Christmas turkey!
More old Christmas turkey!
British justice is best (or merely beyond compare)?
It is disappointing in this as in so many other spheres that it is rarely thought relevant to make comparisons with the rest of Europe. (Why is it that, on the occasions when comparisons are made, they are nearly always with the US?)
What is the situation with regards to these items mentioned? -
Rehabilitation(‘tough on reoffending’) and Restorative justice;
poor education, drug and alcohol dependency and mental health issues - 70% of prisoners with two or more mental health problems.
the high number of women in prison a ‘disgrace’,
the situation of ordinary people going to court for not paying their TV licence with those who commit multibillion-pound financial crimes and get off scot-free.
Does no-one think this is relevant?
Fake 'tough' talk
Michael Robinson’s comments (Labour and Crime) above are completely true. ‘New’ Labour’s obsession with control led to an avalanche of mostly oppressive legislation and many people being criminalised who would not have been formerly.
However, Mr. Khan and his cronies, led by ‘Call me Tony’ Blair previously also pledged to be ‘tough on crime and tough on the causes of crime’.
Given that poverty and deprivation are acknowledged as the foremost breeding ground (other than banking!) for criminality, perhaps Mr. Khan might explain why, after three ‘New’ Labour governments, ordinary people were worse off financially than at any time since the Depression and the prison population expanded more during that time – to record levels - than at any other in living memory.
Is that 'the Michael
Is that 'the Michael Robinson' from the fair city of Sunderland still ranting and raging in that same inimitable Irish manner about our great and equitable British Legal System! Many's the time we have all had our ear drums bruised whilst sitting in the Sunderland Magistrates Court cafe which was affectionately known as the "non-defamation area"!!
If it is the same MR then keep it up old chap as most defence solicitors will still no doubt be deaf to your logic.
Willy Johnstone