LASPO bound for statute book after cliffhanger final vote
The government’s controversial legal aid reforms are set to become law after it won its final battle over the bill in the House of Lords yesterday.
Peers had inflicted 14 defeats on the government in votes on proposed amendments to the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders bill during its parliamentary passage.
The final vote, on an amendment called by Labour’s former attorney general Lady Scotland to ensure legal aid for more domestic violence victims, ended in a draw, with 238 peers voting for it and 238 against. Under parliamentary convention that counts as a win for the government.
Lady Scotland’s amendment was the only change still under debate after crossbencher Lord Pannick reluctantly withdrew his amendment seeking a statement in the bill putting a duty on the government to ensure access to legal advice.
Earlier in the week, the government announced a concession to one of the most controversial elements in part 2 of the bill, agreeing to exclude claims for the lung disease mesothelioma from the reforms until a review of their impact on other areas had been carried out.
The bill is now set for royal assent. The Ministry of Justice said no date for that had been confirmed, but it is ‘likely to be soon’.
Labour’s shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan said: ‘The bill is a sad and tatty chapter in the story of post-war access to justice. The onslaught on our precious legal aid system is an act of vandalism for which this Tory-led government will be forever remembered.'
News
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination


Comments
Disgusting
A disgraceful piece of legislation that will destroy lives and restrict access to justice for all.
LASPO
Mr. Khan's hypocrisy is typical of politicians in general and his own party in particular. It was Labour who began a sustained assault on access to justice in the U.K.
They made it a joke. The coalition have made it a sick one.