Lawyers ‘not trusted’ by majority, says consumer watchdog

Survey - TH
Tuesday 21 June 2011 by Catherine Baksi

Under half of the general public trust lawyers, according to the results of a survey commissioned by consumer watchdog the Legal Services Consumer Panel.

Published today, the research reveals that only 47% of people in England and Wales trust lawyers to tell the truth. That figure drops to 38% for those aged 18-24 and 34% for people from non-white backgrounds.

Lawyers ranked third in the table of ‘trustworthy’ professions, after doctors, who were trusted by 85%, and teachers, trusted by 71%.

Pollsters YouGov questioned 1,277 members of the public aged 18 and over, and 1,114 adults who had used legal services in the last two years.

They found that 31% of the general public had used legal services in the last two years, most commonly for conveyancing, will-writing and family matters.

More positively for lawyers, the research shows that most consumers whose matters had finished (84%) were satisfied or very satisfied with the outcome of the legal work. However this varied depending on the area of work.

While nine out of 10 consumers were happy with the outcomes and service received for will-writing, fewer than seven in 10 were happy with the outcomes and service for accident or injury claims.

The research highlighted areas where solicitors are falling short on some aspects of service, with 11% of respondents dissatisfied with levels of communication and 12% unhappy with the timeliness of work done.

Just over half (51%) of respondents said they would be confident complaining about a lawyer, although only 44% said they knew how to go about doing so.

Of the 86 respondents who said they had been dissatisfied with the service they received, 35% did nothing about it and only 13% made a formal complaint to the service provider.

Consumers were not all satisfied with the price they paid for their legal services – 56% of respondents considered they had got value for money.

Despite some dissatisfaction with pricing, the incidence of consumers shopping around for legal services was low, with 19% saying they had done so. This rose to 29% for conveyancing.

When it came to choosing a lawyer, previous use of the provider was the most common factor, followed by referrals from another organisation and recommendation by family or friends.

Reputation was the most important factor, with 18% of recent users saying this had influenced their choice.

Specialism, speed, location and price were other important factors. Just 1% of respondents had used a price comparison website before picking their solicitor, and 5% had used quality marks to help them choose.

The panel released the findings ahead of the publication of its Consumer Impact Report, which aims to assess the progress of the legal services reforms against the panel’s vision for the market. That report is due later this month.

Panel chair Dianne Hayter said: ‘Consumers place their trust in lawyers to protect their interests when they are at their most vulnerable, so it is extremely worrying that fewer than half of the public say they would generally trust lawyers to tell the truth.

'The profession must look hard at itself and work to restore confidence in lawyers as trusted advisers.'

Hayter said that although most consumers get the outcome they want when using legal services, lawyers are not meeting their clients’ expectations in some crucial areas.

‘No doubt businesses poised to enter the legal market from October will take note that consumers are demanding better value for money and excellent service from their lawyers,’ she said.

Law Society president Linda Lee said: ‘It is encouraging to see that of the 10 professions looked at, lawyers are the third most trusted by the public. We will continue to work with the profession to enhance their standing further. It is also encouraging to see that the vast majority of clients consider they get a good service from their solicitor and that they act professionally.

‘These findings follow the Ministry of Justice’s recent report which found high satisfaction levels among legal services users (94% of whom had used a solicitor). In that survey 91% felt they had been provided with good service and 93% said they were satisfied with the outcome from the service provided.

‘However, perhaps more concerning and confusing is that the LSCP should seek to portray what are predominantly positive findings about the legal profession so negatively, a decision which perhaps says more about LSCP than it does about the legal profession.’

Comments

Lawyers not trusted

Did they include pollsters in their list of professions that people trust. Perhaps we ought to have a poll amongst solicitors as to how many trust regulators and consumer panels.

It depends who you ask...

This just goes to show how much depends on who you ask. It is not a surprise that the vast majority of people who have actually used a solicitor were satisfied with the service they received.We should be very proud of that.

The real problem however is the warped view of lawyers held by those who have no first hand knowledge. This perception is no doubt coloured by the negative reviews we get in the press and the lawyer bashing engaged in by this government (and the last one) and the constant drip feed of anti lawyer propaganda initiated by the liabilty insurers.

What I cannot understand is why anyone would trust what they are told by journalists, politicians and insurers.

I pray that the Law Society and the Legal Services Consumer Panel use this research to reassure the public that lawyers can be trusted - and indeed are trusted by those who have actually used them. I suspect, however, that the research will simply be used in the negative manner in which it appears to have been interpreted so far.

I Wonder

I wonder what percentage of the legal profession expect their clients, the public, to tell the truth?

That is the problem. The only

That is the problem. The only time solicitors appear in the press is for examples like that - it only takes a few to taint the view of the profession who are mostly very honest and hardworking.

LSCP

Just go on the LSCP's website and look at their "CV's". It reads like the jobs section in the Guardian. Most seem to never had proper jobs - just being on the board for this, board for that - in short just bossing people around. Surpised that Harman isn't on the panel actually.

You clearly have an agenda.

You clearly have an agenda. Lawyers, mechanics, doctors, plumbers, builders, bakers, mortgage brokers, estate agents, teachers.......no profession is squeaky clean. But it is not the profession that is foul, it is individuals within it!

"Solicitor firm deals with deceased estate in double quick"

"Solicitor firm helps man save inhritance tax"

"Solicitor firm helps family avoid Court of Protection costs"

Headlines like the above will never appear because no one cares despite these being closer to reality.

Are you now going to sift throught the BMJ and list headlines of struck off Doctors?

Lawyers not trusted

Nowadays, Solicitors get lumped together with others when the expression "lawyers" is used. I wouldn't be surprised if the public were dissatisfied with the types of conveyancing factories that nowadays pass for "lawyers" or with will-writing organisations. Also, trusted to do what? I would be surprised if people didn't trust lawyers doing their conveyancing to whom they may pay over often hundreds of thousands of pounds. It would seem an odd thing to do if you don't trust the recipients. The question "do you trust lawyers?" is too broad. We need to know (a) trusted to do/not do what and (b) what do you mean by lawyers!

Spot on!

Exactly. 'Solicitors' are tarnished by so many non-solicitor outfits many of the individuals of which come across as unfit to even flip a burger let alone think they can understand the intricacies of legal conveyancing (and don't get me started on how PII has increased). So ask the right question as using 'lawyers' is too wide. You'd be shocked by how many people think they have a 'solicitor' when they actually have someone barely skilled at finding their way to work! Now that is not honest if you have misled the customer.

Maybe they do know nothing

Maybe they do know nothing about law, but they usually know how to run a business for profit. Regrettably nowadays that's the most important attribute.

Majority distrust solicitors

In my view the survey is not an accurate reflection of the public mistrust of the solicitors as from the record number of complaints the profession has attracted in recent years the true figure is much higher than the 53% revealed by this selective survey.

From over 10,000 complaints in 2009 only 14 soilictors were barred I believe, a clear demonstration of the fact the profession is in disrepute and the self regulation is no longer working.

Before people start huffing may I suggest that you look at the hard facts, number of complaints, number of firms shut down or intervened and the number of crooked solicitors brought to Justice in the last 5 years.

From our members experiences the key areas of public concern are, integrity, honesty and misrepresentations made in the Courts in order to win any which way regardless of the injustice perpetrated and in violation of their Oath.

It might be an idea for the solicitors/barristers to be reminded of their Oath before they speak in Court, just as witnesses have to before entering the witness box.

Clearly, the rogues are a minority in the profession and undoubtedly the majority of the solicitors are good hard working people.

The Law Society and the SRA should immediately cease behaving like trade bodies and instead assume the position of an effective Regulator acting in the public interest.

The recent guilty verdict in the case of Davenport Lyons partners which took over two and half years for the SDT to reach is a case in point at the inefficient and ineffective workings of the Law Society.

With thousands of complaints pending and a timescale of anything from a year to several years before resolution its not a rocket science to understand the lack of faith and trust by the majority of the public in the legal profession.

Why do you assume that every

Why do you assume that every complaint is a valid well founded complaint?

My experience is that most complainants are chancers seeking money, or they complain because they have been told something they don't like/want to hear.

Trade body

Good lord, the Law Society a trade body? That would suggestion they have actually done us solicitors some good.

The SRA a trade body? Laughable.

Cynical

Despite being "not trusted" did we not come in as the third most trustworthy profession? Does this not say more about us being a nation of cynics rather anything about lawyers?

Anonymous on Tue, 21/06/2011 - 19:22.

No, solicitors/lawyers did not even get a note, its seems Journalists and Ordinary man/woman in the street rated higher.

1. Doctors
2. Teachers
3. Professors
4. Judges
5. The Gardai
6. Television Newsreaders
7. Scientists
8. Clergymen / Priests
9. Civil Servants
10. The ordinary man/woman in the street
11. Journalists
12. Trade Union Officials

The Irish Republic

The Gardai are the Irish Republic Police. This is not a UK surevy.

Either

The poster above is either wrong, or this article is inaccurate. We must be told.

Poll...

There is a poll with Lawyers on:

The poll was commissioned by a search engine site and asked 1,231 people for their opinion.

It found that the top 10 least trusted professions are:

1. Politicians – 68%

2. Estate agents – 59%

3. Plumbers – 54%

4. Door to door salesmen – 47%

5. Taxi drivers – 46%

6. Sportsmen – 41%

7. Bankers – 38%

8. Lawyers – 37%

9. Bricklayers – 32%

10. Accountants – 29%

Gardai Impersonators

If the Gardai are patrolling UK streets, no wonder they`re not trusted . Wrong uniforms for a start !

Poll...

Where are the second hand car salesman in that list !??