Legal advice agencies hit by funding cut

Solicitor Jacqui Brooks (left) advising at the RCJ CAB
Monday 21 January 2013 by Catherine Baksi

Organisations helping not-for-profit agencies and litigants in person have been dealt another blow by the decision to axe Community Legal Service grants.

After consultation, the Legal Services Commission announced this week that funding to the Advice Services Alliance, Law Centres Network and the Royal Courts of Justice CAB will cease from 1 April when the current grants come to an end, saving £655,317.

The LSC said the decision was taken ‘in light of the future impacts of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act on legal aid, financial pressures and the LSC’s current priorities’. It said the grants fund activities that are not ‘core’ to the LSC business.

The RCJ CAB helps litigants in person involved in cases at the High Court, Court of Appeal and Principal Registry. The grant funds a team of four solicitors and two receptionists, who with 170 volunteers from 60 City firms, help 2,000 people a year.

Chief executive Alison Lamb said the service is trying to secure alternative funding from the Ministry of Justice.

‘It’s ironic that we’re struggling to keep the service going when we know that the number of self-represented litigants will increase dramatically with the legal aid cuts in April,’ she said.

Comments

Withdraw of funding for advice to LIPs at the RCJ

At a time when there are so many cut backs in funding and availability of public funding to assist litigants - how can the closure of the CAB services assisting litigants in person at the RCJ be justified? It beggers belief!

Withdrawal of Funding

I could not agree more with the previous comment. I am already seeing disasters on the legal front for so many new LIPs - one wonders what the eventual toll will be in April?

Perhaps one must set about creating a new definition of the word 'Justice'?

Withdrawal of funding

Indeed - Justice in the UK will mean something VERY different for those who are wealthy and those who are not...

is there something nasty

is there something nasty going on in the Justice woodshed?

Over a year ago my MP responded to my concern about LIPs and legal aid cuts that all was well as the Judges would look after them.Yet only earlier this month Lord Justice Thomas's brochure for SRLs (new style LIPs) in the Interim Applications Court commended the RCJ CAB, referred to their booklets and said SRLs should " if possible take advice from the CAB". Well it doesn't look as though it will be possible much longer as its not part of the LSCs core business.So whose core business is it? Oh yes...it's the judiciary's of course!

And cutting the ASA and Law Centres funding suggests that an even more legally illiterate public is part of the plan by ensuring informed self help is significantly reduced.

Good luck to their lordships.

Solicitor ( retired)

A saving of £655,317? Whoopee

A saving of £655,317? Whoopee doo...........

I had expected an announcement that these services would receive extra funding to help deal with the impending chaos after April.

This petty, nasty little cut belongs in the same category as the forthcoming "bedroom tax;" a sordid and spiteful attack on the most vulnerable for little or no gain.

I agree with Downhearted

Even by the standards of recent proposals for reform this is daft. It seems like a pincer movement...this on one side, non-lawyer Grayling bleating on about QCs on the other.

Gloomy times for justice.

Legal Advice Agencies Funding Cuts

Shame and Double Standards !

Access to Justice is a basic Human Right.

Advice Charities

Councillors are getting more casework as ATOS drives disabled people from DLA onto Employment Support Allowance then onto JSA even if they're completely immobile. Nearly all disabled claimants are refused ESA and either appeal or try to 'find work' on the much lower JSA - or increasingly, contemplate suicide. The appeals take 6+ months and they get £70pw basic ESA instead of £120pw DLA and fall behind with bills and rent. The only people grinning about this unfolding nightmare are ultra-right-wing Conservatives and the loan sharks. Wonga loans are at 4,200% APR for example. I am dreading my surgeries by October once all the 'reforms' bed in and Universal Credit includes Housing benefit gets paid a month in arrears to people who barely budget weekly. It doesn't take a rocket-scientist to predict that a tsunami of rent arrears will hit the UK.

Now when you factor in the ten major welfare 'reforms' in April thru October and the removal of all specialist advice funding by the UK Government when £1M of legal aid and Legal Services Commission funding ends in Cardiff in April - we have a recipe for mass homelessness and civic disorder that could cost the city tens of millions when we have to cut £25M this year and £25M next year from our budgets. It's difficult to forecast the full impact but from the end of summer onwards, I fear we may be forced into drastic measures such as leasing hundreds of hotel rooms as the hostel spaces quickly run out.

I Chair Riverside Advice with the largest LSC contract in Wales and so, apart from some Housing contract work, I will have to lay off 20 out of 28 staff in April and disband a centre of experise built up over the years. Our two sister groups, Speakeasy and Cardiff Law Centre may well close leaving no expert, accredited, Quality Marked and indemnified services in the capital.

Regretably, CAB in Cardiff and other groups offer 15 minute sessions for a few hours a week at a series of 'hubs' or via call centres but, as many of you know, 80% of specialist advice business is by referral from doctors, social workers, housing officers and health care professionals - such detailed and often time-consuming support is, I believe, beyond the scope of such generalist 'Advice Lite' services that will remain who will be unable to support clients through the various appeal and tribunal treadmills bar the odd letter or two.

There's more to specialist advice than throughput and ticking boxes but many council officers and politicians can not or will not grasp the fundamental differences beween generalist and specialist advice and often portray specialist advice to potential funders as 'not being value for money.' Bias and ignorance are the most toxic of bedfellows.

'We're all in it together' is a shallow slogan that highlights the true nature of a similar empty phrase - 'trickle-down economics' - only from April 2013 onwards the only 'trickle-down' will be from Hooray Henries urinating on the homeless sick and disabled people sleeping in shop doorways.

Cllr Paul Mitchell
Chair Riverside Advice

Advice Charities

I was informed by a severely disabled friend of mine a few weeks ago that that in the case of 1,100 suicides in the last 12 months the reason for suicide given was the removal of benefits. I found this statistic disturbing to the point of disbelief. Has anyone else seen this statistic published anywhere?

LIP Handbook

No wonder the LIP handbook was prepared!!

Axing Community Legal Service Grants

All I can do is add my anger and outrage to the comments above all of which I am in complete agreement. This hooray Henry government seems intent on removing access to justice not just from the most vulnerable members of our society, but from huge swathes of it. I am an accountant - not someone who usually employs alarmist rehtoric, but I have little doubt that by the end of the year the Legal Services Commission, Mr Grayling and his predecessor Mr Clarke will have blood on their hands.

Access to advice - the latest cuts

I have had many years' experience as a solicitor in private practice, dealing with clients who need help and support for many reasons, not just financial. I have also voluntarily worked as a Trustee for fifteen years for the local CAB and also for a major mental health charity. I have been involved in other areas supporting those who need help - campaigning for better mental health community support, for example. This is not party political, it is my way of giving back to society.

I just cannot comprehend the sheer viciousness of the combination of these cuts. Remove benefits from the disabled, remove funding for basic access to advice, by definition remove access to debt counselling normally provided by advice agencies now being disbanded - to what sort of third world level are we sinking? Has the Justice Minister the remotest idea of the juggling which is a necessary part of the life of those on the margins?

I know there need to be economies and I know that there are crooked claimants and debtors who will happily walk away from their debts; but the vast majority find themselves where they are through no fault of their own, and I challenge the minister to manage for more than a month on a single person's benefit without requiring the help and advice he is denying to others.

I agree completely with the

I agree completely with the comments above. This is tantamoount to a criminal act; by withdrawing basic services to those in greatest need for a petty saving this is obviously a false economy. This service represents the best value for money there is for the 'justice' system.
It is totally unncessary to make this cut to such a necessary and brilliant service for a sum which anyone in the cabinet could pay out of their own pocket (just from interest on their capital for a few months). How can they possibly justify this?
How can billionaire George Osbourne be allowed to claim expenses from the public purse for his horse stable over a year or two for a sum on which this entire LIP scheme is run. (not to mention all the other public monies which MPs claim for themselves - while failing to stand up for their disabled or unemployed constituents) The cost of the scheme is minimal compared to the cost of a couple of high maintenance trees in Portcullis House or the payout for a failed executive, and yet justice is shelved?
The RCJ scheme represents the best possible service to so many people in the court system who would not otherwise know where to start. I have used it and recommend it highly. It uses volunteer lawyers - already a cost saving. Withdrawing this service will land the court with far more problems with cases and LIPs, and of course will detriment LIPs far too greatly, at great human cost.
Is there no way of reviewing this decision? Some kind of campagin must be launched in public. Government ministers are withdrawing services to the people who most need them in every possible way, for vicious cheap 'savings' which they could individually afford themsevles in a single donation.

99 per cent

The government seems determined to go the Mitt Romney way. Clearly it is not concerned how people see how it despises those who are not among its favoured elites and cliques. This is the socialised bullying of the playground transferred into serious questions of power and wealth.

Declaring hand on heart, how they care, they understand, how they or their grandparents came from hard times and places, does not make that declaration any less of a lie. For a lie it is seen to be.

Injustice is not only being done, but being seen to be done.

Cllr Mitchell

""Councillors are getting more casework as ATOS drives disabled people from DLA onto Employment Support Allowance then onto JSA even if they're completely immobile.""

not another politico complaining about having to do what he was elected to do.

He might find that a lot of the legal issues in Cardiff revolve around his councils social services?

He might better address his complaints that way rather than at the "cuts"