LSB sets diversity reporting deadline
Law firms have until the end of September to provide diversity data about every member of staff, including their ethnicity, religious beliefs, socio-economic background and sexual orientation.
The timeline emerged last week when the Legal Services Board (LSB) published its qualified approval of the Solicitors Regulation Authority’s (SRA) action plan to improve data collection and transparency around diversity and social mobility in the profession.
The LSB approved a planned ‘standalone exercise’ in the third quarter of 2012 through which firms are to collect and submit data to the SRA for publication in the first quarter of 2013. It also approved the plan to require firms to publish the data themselves, starting 2013.
To collect the data, the LSB approved the SRA plan to give firms a ‘model questionnaire’ through which every member of staff - lawyers and non-lawyers - can self-classify against the characteristics of age, gender, disability, ethnic group, religion or belief, sexual orientation, socio-economic background and caring responsibilities.
However, the LSB expressed ‘some concern’ that the SRA’s plan had missed the March 2012 deadline for publishing diversity data. However, it accepted the SRA’s argument that it would have been ‘disproportionate’ to expect otherwise given the number of solicitors that it regulated and the ‘level of change already underway’ that the profession was undergoing.
The LSB published a consultation document Increasing diversity and social mobility in the legal workforce: transparency and evidence on 15 December 2010. The SRA action plan was devised to comply with the guidance, issued by the SRA in July 2011, arising from the consultation findings.
News
- LETR ‘delayed by regulators’
- UK turns back on EU justice project
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals


Comments
I'm not going to...
agree to this.
If handed a form by my employer, I'm ticking the "prefer not to say" box. What a utter waste of time and paper by the LSB.
This is not the way to tackle discrimination in the profession.
Have a gander at the LSB's
Have a gander at the LSB's website at their own governing board -
http://www.legalservicesboard.org.uk/about_us/our_board/index.htm
Seems to be a true model of diversity...
Start questionnaire with the SRA own management
Sorry what is the purpose of all this. So SRA go to those firms and intervene.
SRA should complete a questionnaire within their own organisation first. It will be amazing how many white faces you will see at that level.
There is a lot of discrimination within the Law Society/SRA. Look what they did to Ms Kamlesh Bahl.
LS Sayer could not stomach it that not only the first woman president but first Asian woman president being considered for the LS. They dismissed her. Sorry to say SRA are bullying and harassing BME solicitors and there is no body to control them.
I would like to ask LSB what are you doing?
I would like to ask LS what are you doing?
This is all a sham and waste of time. Since Lord Ousley's report nothing has changed.
LSB Diversity reporting
How pleased I am that I retired in 2000 since when the profession has seemingly become prey to every whim of those who now dictate to what was once a proud independent profession whose objective was serving its clients, it seems now a mere creature of the state having lost all that lawyers have striven for over the centuries.
I'm sorry to say I agree with
I'm sorry to say I agree with the above. Each time I have mentioned racism within the profession and my own ethnicity, which is not immediately obvious. I have received a response of - how dare you say that- and found my self ousted from friendship/ employment. Although I accept racism is inherent in our society it still surprises me how such educated people are so inherently racist and often so ignorant of this fact.
I might well put on the form
I might well put on the form "I regard these questions as inappropriate, intrusive and grossly improper and in breach of my rights to private life under the Eureopan Comnvention on Human Rights as enshrined in UK Law".
What would the LSB muppets think to that?