- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Repeat medical errors fuel NHS legal bill
Errors in maternity care that landed the NHS with a £3.1bn legal bill over 10 years are still being repeated, a new report has warned.
The study by the NHS Litigation Authority found there were 5,087 maternity claims between 2000 and 2010. It was the most costly type of litigation managed by NHSLA.
With increasing future care costs, the size of awards is only set to increase, the authority concluded.
The three most frequent categories of claim related to management of labour (14%), caesarean section (13%) and cerebral palsy (11%).
There were a total of 83 maternity claims where the main allegation involved a drug error, totalling around £9m.
The report recommended that risk management be improved at all levels, with NHS organisations regularly reviewing claims, complaints and incidents reports to look for patterns or error.
It added: ‘Recommendations for improving safety in maternity care, such as compulsory attendance at regular training sessions, especially for cardiotocography (CTG) interpretation, good communication between midwives, doctors and women, up-to-date guidelines for managing routine care and protocols to guide staff dealing with emergencies remain as relevant now as at any time in the past.’
For all settled maternity claims, the average time from the incident date to the date when the claim was resolved by the NHSLA was 4.32 years.
For claims with damages above £1m, the average time to resolution was 8.57 years, reflecting the more complex nature of the cases.
Chief executive of the NHS Confederation Mike Farrar said: 'This is an important and helpful report. We are fortunate in this country that maternity care is relatively safe but to keep it that way the NHS has got to keep learning and improving.
'We must in particular learn from the occasions where things have gone very badly wrong. You cannot turn back the clock on a tragedy but you can do everything possible to prevent recurrence by focusing relentlessly on minimising risks.'
- LETR ‘delayed by regulators’
- UK turns back on EU justice project
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals