Mental health lawyers accuse Baird of being 'insulting'
Mental health lawyers accused legal aid minister Vera Baird of being unhelpful and insulting last week despite winning key concessions from her in relation to the Carter review of legal aid procurement.
Solicitors also warned that she was interfering in the peer review process and risked undermining its independence.
Ms Baird acknowledged that Lord Carters review had not hit the button when it came to the fixed fee rates proposed for mental health work, and said it was unlikely that a fixed-fee scheme would be ready by April 2007.
She told delegates at the Mental Health Lawyers Association (MHLA) conference that she wanted more input from solicitors in how to sensitise the fee rates for mental health work but that she wanted to get rid of hourly rates. If you pay for hours, you get hours. Its the way of the world, she said.
MHLA chairman Richard Charlton said members had been insulted by the insinuation that they were wasting time by seeing clients for too long under the hourly rate system, and had found her style and approach to be very unhelpful with a lack of empathy.
He added that he was particularly worried by Ms Bairds interference in the peer review process. She told delegates it was her powerful view that peer reviewers should not be prescribing to practitioners how many times they should visit clients. She has also taken steps to remove peer review guidance from the Legal Services Commission (LSC) Web site.
Mr Charlton said he would be writing to the Lord Chancellor to express concern that a minister should be intervening in the peer review process in this way. But he said it was positive that fixed fees would be delayed and that Ms Baird was willing to meet with mental health lawyers.
The Lord Chancellor also told delegates at the Law Societys law management section conference this week that he wanted to give the signal that the government needed to look in some detail again at the mental health proposals.

