MoJ backtracks on victim compensation cuts
The government has announced it will delay proposed changes to compensation for victims of crime – just three days after defending its plans in parliament.
On Friday, new justice minister Helen Grant backed the government’s proposals to cut compensation for victims claiming less than £2,500. However it emerged yesterday that the Ministry of Justice has ordered a rethink.
In a statement, a spokesman for the MoJ said: ‘The government is committed to providing the best possible support for victims of crime - maintaining compensation for the most seriously affected - and to reforming the criminal injuries compensation scheme to put it on a sustainable financial footing.
‘We have listened to the views expressed in parliament and will now consider our next steps.’
The announcement amounts to a tacit admission that the government has failed to win parliamentary approval for the changes, which were due to come in to force on 30 September.
On Friday, Grant had told the Commons there was ‘no compelling case for maintaining payments for minor injuries’, adding that cuts would save the taxpayer £50m a year. She said liabilities for the compensation scheme overall stood at £532m, with new liabilities arising at a rate of £200m a year.
Shadow justice minister Rob Flello said the cuts would have affected innocent victims of crime.
‘At every turn, Labour is watching the actions of this government. The Tory-led government is putting the wrong people first, to date they've put the needs of victims at the bottom of their priority list.’
The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers and shop workers’ union Usdaw had opposed the changes, estimating that 30,000 people would be denied compensation if they were victims of a crime.
News
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination

Comments
Another U-Turn
Another correct U-Turn from these morons in government. When will they learn to think an idea through properly before announcing it to the press?
MoJ backtracks on victim compensation cuts
DG spot on!
U-TURN
Spot oo DG
High Comedy
This Government clearly think "The Thick of It" is a fly - on - the - wall documentary .
This government’s growing tendency to rush into things
We all understand that public expenditure has to be cut in the light of the economic crisis, but what worries me is this government’s growing tendency to rush into things without proper preparation or research – this sadly seems another example. Let’s hope it’s the last.
Attended a Conservative Party
Attended a Conservative Party bash at the House of Commons a few years ago - all about reforming conveyancing so that ideas could be taken aboard by the Government in waiting
The host for the event was a certain Grant Shapps, now a Minister.
Despite the fact that a number of sensible ideas came from the floor it was clear that the hosts were not listening and the event was more about generating publicity for Kirsty Alsopp and the Conservative Part not improving the conveyancing process