- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
MoJ to consult on PI discount rate
The Ministry of Justice is to re-examine the discount rate used to calculate the amount deducted from an injured person’s compensation to account for income received from investing the damages, the Gazette has learned. The personal injury discount rate of 2.5% has not changed since 2001.
Last year the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers (APIL) threatened a judicial review over the issue and has now been promised a consultation by the MoJ in the light of historically low interest rates.
A spokesman for the association said: ‘The discount rate is a matter of historic concern for APIL and, although we have been assured that a consultation will take place in the near future, we are still disappointed that it has taken the government this long to get this far.’ He explained a new rate was a ‘matter of urgency’ for some injured people under-compensated by hundreds of thousands of pounds. A consultation is expected to open in April.
Meanwhile, claimant firms enjoyed a victory in the High Court last week as master of the rolls Lord Neuberger ordered that interest on costs should run from the date of the order (the incipitur date). The case, Simcoe v Jacuzzi UK Group, was an appeal by the claimant’s firm Irwin Mitchell after a previous judgment that interest of 8% should be added from the date the costs were assessed or agreed.
Neuberger said the fact a claimant’s solicitors were acting under a conditional fee arrangement ‘does not justify’ departing from the general rule of interest from the incipitur date.
Neuberger also criticised the £75,000 costs bill in a case with agreed damages of £12,750, describing the civil justice system as ‘out of kilter’.
- Neuberger defends judges’ right to speak out on cuts
- HRA applies to soldiers on duty, Supreme Court confirms
- Hundreds face ‘unrated cycle’ as Balva fails
- Consumer panel promises ‘long game’ on will regulation
- Close down CMCs tomorrow - Desmond Hudson
- Wiltshire solicitor’s murderer jailed for 28 years
- Profits squeeze as top-50 firms open results season
- Prison term sought for quoting Society charity report
- Legal aid champion Storer honoured
- Hudson questions SRA’s firm finances disclosure
- Judges could quit over pensions
- Intervention row heads to Strasbourg
- Hunt begins for new SRA chief
- SRA ‘wrong to pursue costs via conduct rules’
- Jackson prompts spurt in law firm start-ups
- Legal aid cuts ‘end high-profile BME cases’
- Carbon footprint down 7% in legal sector
- Mystery surrounds legal training report
- Family lawyers divided over Prest decision
- Consumer rights boost welcomed by Society
- Old Bailey offers peek at ‘Dead Man’s Walk’
- Peer-to-peer pioneer
- EC in cartels drive
- Thousands of court workers to strike on Monday
- RTA claims still high despite referral fee ban
- Law firms warned on debt recovery
- Ombudsman claims wider territory
- SRA puts a price on extra intervention levy