Mutiny on Merseyside over weekend courts
The Ministry of Justice has denied reports it has ditched or delayed plans to open courts at weekends.
But the Gazette has learned that a scheme to pilot weekend magistrates’ court sittings in Liverpool has been postponed after Merseyside solicitors ‘unanimously refused’ to cover the sittings.
Steve Cornforth, president of Liverpool Law Society, told the Gazette the pilot was due to begin on 6 October but has now been postponed. He said the MoJ had given no reason for the postponement, but Cornforth suggested it could have been linked to the area’s solicitors ‘unanimously refusing’ to volunteer to cover a weekend duty rota.
Nothwithstanding the fact that solicitors will not be paid extra to attend the weekend sittings, and the cost implications for others in the justice system, Cornforth insisted the extended sittings are unnecessary anyway.
‘Even after the closure of courts in Knowsley and Southport, Liverpool Magistrates’ Court (pictured) does not have enough court business to fill it Monday to Friday,’ he said. Earlier this month, the Gazette reported that Manchester solicitors had agreed to boycott the pilot in their area.
Newspapers reported this week that pilot schemes planned for eight areas including Nottingham, Staffordshire and Birmingham had been ditched or put on hold indefinitely, and that trialling in County Durham had been suspended as funding constraints meant the local prison was unable to receive prisoners at the weekend. However, an MoJ spokeswoman said none of the planned pilots had been either postponed or cancelled, adding: ‘Nothing has changed.’
She also said pilots were going ahead in Cardiff, Neath, Bridgend, Southampton, Bristol, Chelmsford and ‘several areas in the north-east’.
Defending the plans announced by his predecessor in July, justice minister Damian Green said: ‘The experience from last summer’s riots showed that putting offenders before a court swiftly is in the interests of victims and witnesses, and brings them face to face with the consequences of their actions.’
He added: ‘We are improving the use of video links in court and working with local areas to test whether a more flexible criminal justice system, including courts sitting outside traditional hours, is better able to achieve this. We are determined to create a system that works in the interests of those who use it.’
News
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS
- Grayling says no to regulating will-writing
- Society and bar join hands against criminal justice plans
- 100 jobs at risk as BLP seeks 15% salary cost cut
- Bar Council picks a former mandarin
- 30 to meet Grayling in legal aid crisis talks
- Shadow minister hints at ‘unwind’ of Jackson reforms
- Legal education move by embattled Co-op
- Government ‘ignoring’ calls for further RTA review
- Immigration clampdown ‘danger’ to legal sector
- Fiji rule of law report found in contempt
- ‘Don’t ditch quality,’ says Desmond Hudson
- Wragge & Co takes axe to legal support jobs
- Call for solicitors to use British Sign Language
- Foreign case influx at commercial court
- Government red tape reverse
- Sri Lanka relents on visit

Comments
Meaningless.
"We are determined to create a system that works in the interests of those who use it"
Utterly meaningless drivel.
Newcastle Upon Tyne
Solicitors on the Duty Rota for Newcastle upon Tyne also refused to take part in the Sunday Remand Court pilot. It is to be run every other Sunday. Apparently the LSC sought help from Solicitors from outside teh area.
I have corresponded directly with MoJ and LSC who have failed to recognise the fact that it is costing money to test out Court opening hours that no-one who actually understands the system believes is necessary.
This is a complete waste of money.
However allied to this is teh fact that legal aid has suddenly become a lot harder to get. 16 year olds and school leavers with several GCSE's now decide the Interests of Justice test. Court legal advisers are no longer involved in the process. Yet we are expected to advise clients to enter a plea at the very first hearing without any certainty of being paid. Given that tehre appears to be something of a revolutionary spirit amongs some Solicitors perhaps it is only right that we stop playing the MoJ's speedy justice game and start looking after our own interests by only proceeding with cases when legal aid is granted.