News focus: College of Law chief explains post-buyout plans
The College of Law (CoL) is set to expand in the UK and overseas with ‘brand and values intact’ following its £200m sale to a private equity firm, chief executive Nigel Savage has told the Gazette.
Savage condemned the current wide-ranging review of legal education and training as ‘five years too late’ and said it was time that law schools became ‘more like medical schools, with students learning hands-on skills from day one’.
He warned that the UK will soon lose its position as ‘world leader in legal services’ unless it adapts quickly to 21st-century market conditions and ensures that English law remains the ‘global law’ of international transactions.
In his first substantive interview since Montagu Private Equity bought the CoL in April, Savage said the deal would be ‘no slash and burn, and then a quick sale’. He said: ‘Montagu is taking the long view. It only buys successful, well-managed businesses that can deliver revenue growth. We have a proven record of doing precisely that.’
The CoL already has eight centres around England and Wales, plus ‘hubs’ in South America and south-east Asia. It also offers an online law masters degree, in collaboration with the International Bar Association, in 35 countries. ‘Backed by Montagu’s funds, we can continue our expansion, but move faster, invest faster and make faster acquisitions,’ said Savage. ‘Montagu has bought our brand and values, and knows that it makes good business sense to keep them intact.’
Legal education has been slow to respond to the rapidly changing legal services market, he added. ‘The solicitor’s job is not to obsess about the law, but to deliver solutions to clients. There is a great opportunity for the CoL to move towards practice-focused degrees, with more emphasis on client care, ethics, arbitration and mediation. Students should not learn law in a vacuum, but in the context of advising individuals and corporations.’
Savage said it is for this reason that law firms are increasingly ‘buying into workplace law schools’, with recruits joining the firm after school and working via CILEX (Chartered Institute of Legal Executives) qualifications to a degree and online LPC. He said: ‘Most new ideas are a rehash of old ideas and this is no different. It’s very familiar to those older lawyers who went the five-year route through articles.’ He described the training contract as a ‘Victorian notion’ that was a barrier to ‘an accessible legal market’.
Savage said law firms have known about alternative business structures for years, but did nothing while businesses such as the the Co-op were quietly appointing paralegals and legal practice course (LPC) graduates to provide a competitive service based on the new business model. He said: ‘The Law Society and Bar were slow to take on board that the world of legal services has changed for ever.’
The current Legal Education and Training Review, a joint project of the Solicitors Regulation Authority, the Bar Standards Board and ILEX Professional Standards, is ‘five years too late’ in responding to changes that have already come about, he added.
The CoL chief rejected criticisms from the Junior Lawyers Division and others that the College of Law is making money on the back of LPC students who have no realistic prospect of securing a training contract and entering the profession. He said: ‘Let’s not succumb to doom and gloom. The number of training contracts was up 11% last year, and some 82% of our LPC graduates go on to become qualified lawyers.’
There is the potential for continued growth in the legal services market, with all the opportunities that growth brings, he insisted. ‘There is also growth in the railways, but we don’t need more wheel-tappers and shunters. We do need more lawyers,’ he said.
Savage is concerned the UK could lose its global leadership in legal services. He said: ‘The New York bar is already more accessible than our own and there is a real risk that the US will erode the predominance of UK law. The Chinese – or Australians, for that matter – could well come up with a “global law” to supplant our leadership in global transactional deals. We must do more, and urgently, to protect and promote UK law.’
For the moment, however, British higher education is still respected throughout the world, Savage said, pointing to 540 applications from China, the US, Canada and elsewhere for the 200 places available on the CoL’s new undergraduate law degree course, starting in September.
He said: ‘Our critics have drawn attention to Montagu’s lack of experience in education. We say that it is a good thing, because what Montagu bought is the CoL team. Nobody knows more about legal education. We will retain our brand and values. We will not be pushed.’
News
- LETR ‘delayed by regulators’
- UK turns back on EU justice project
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution

Comments
Revolution
I can understand the global dimension to what the College of Law is aiming to do and consider their likelihood of success in the short term to be quite high. What I do not understand are the contradictions of the suggested forthcoming legal revolution. I have listed some of them below:-
1. The End of Lawyers academics are predicting a massive increase in paralegals and fewer lawyers yet there has been an increase in law courses in UK? Surely there should be a drastic decrease in law courses?
2. There is a clear agenda to lower the status of lawyers and attempt to change a client into a customer yet aspiring entrants to the legal sector still believe that the law is a profession that will give them status and respect both in terms of their social position, PAY and delivering their service.
Talk of retail style uniforms for paralegals says it all!
3. If many trainees will soon be earning an intial salary of £11,000 and fewer "lawyer" opportunities
will mean the likelihood of moving up and earning more is unlikely then why would anybody make the sacrifices, both emotional and financial, if the rewards are not there?
4. Supporters of the fat cats and bankers say high pay is justified in order to get the best and ambitious people will need to be incentivised yet the same principle is not going to applied in the brave new legal world?
5. Private schools promote their top education system to parents on the basis that their products will get the better jobs and the legal profession is one of the target professions yet the vast majority of future lawyers will not be able to afford to send their children to private school without a scholarship?
6. The government wants us to save money and have a pension - how will this be possible in paralegal world where salaries will be low and no company pension will be on offer?
Finally, there is a general perception emerging among the conservative middeclass that someone is stealing their share of the pie and making them economically working class. In my opinion this will produce interesting political consequences including the possibility of a landslide socialist victory at the polls in the future. The architects of the agenda should read the history of the french revolution - are the bankers the new french aristocrats?
Too much money made out of too many prospective Solicitors
The real crime is how Universities and the College of Law have fleeced students for thousands and perpetuated the aspiration of becoming a Solicitor. Utilising graduates and LPC qualified graduates as cogs in a sausage machine is not new and was not introduced by the Co-Op. It has been happening for years.
For legal aid firms using CILEX to employ and train staff ("earn as you learn") as an alternative to trainee solicitors makes economic sense. Every legal aid firm should review the CILEX website and plan affordable career development for lawyers for the future.
All law students should look carefully at CILEX and think carefully before giving the law schools loads of money on a punt.
Next consideration is qualified Solicitors requalifying as FILEX and being regulated by CILEX in a cost effective and more supportive way than the SRA could ever manage. The SRA is so obsessed with itself and ABSs that it has forgotten about its core consumer group. Apart from that it fails to address conduct issues relating to conflict of interest and touting for clients primarily because it's not considered important enough. Far better to prepare for ABSs.
Yes, absolutely right on all
Yes, absolutely right on all points!