Ombudsman confirms move into claims management

The change will benefit consumers, Adam Sampson claimed
Tuesday 21 February 2012 by John Hyde

Plans for the Legal Ombudsman to handle complaints about claims management companies will benefit consumers and the legal profession, according to the chief ombudsman.

Proposals to bring complaints about claims management into the scheme’s remit were confirmed at this week’s meeting of the Office for Legal Complaints. Earlier this year, LeO and the Ministry of Justice, which regulates claims management companies, signed an understanding to share information on any breaches of existing rules.

Chief ombudsman Adam Sampson, blogging on the LeO website, said the plans had almost unanimous support from across the legal sector.

He said: ‘For consumers, we are offering the promise of wider access to redress. For the profession, an equalising of the playing field.’ He also said the operating cost of his organisation would be shared more widely. As part of the memorandum of understanding, agreed in January, the MoJ will advise on the rules surrounding regulation of claims management companies.

In return, LeO will supply the MoJ with information about the number of complaints and any trends they may indicate.

Meanwhile, a company handling complaints for the Legal Ombudsman has apologised for a change of address that left solicitor firms giving wrong information to clients. Under the Solicitors Regulation Authority code of conduct, clients must be informed at all times of their right to complain to the ombudsman and ways of doing so.

However, the ombudsman changed its address last year when its previous mail scanning contractor was taken over. Firms should change LeO's postal address in their terms of business and on their websites to ensure clients' right to complain is not inhibited. The correct address is PO Box 6806 Wolverhampton, WV1 9WJ.

Comments

Bureacrat expands empire is

Bureacrat expands empire is hardly news. Bet he gets a nice fat increase in salary and pension!

However he'll not find CMCs the pushover that solicitors are-they don't play by the same rules at all-and they're not a profession so professional conduct doesn't apply.

A good news story

Dear John Hyde

Good God, a good news story!!!

But - surely the next step is to scrap the CMC Regulator and to shift the CMC structure/authorisation process into the legal sector - proper scrutiny of CMCs would I expect result in most of them having their authorisation - their badge of approval from the MoJ - withdrawn.

Alternatively, take a genuinely courageous step - scrap the whole authorisation process and only allow CMCs to exist as ABSs regulated by the SRA.... The application of the suitability test to the market traders of the quasi legal sector would be interesting.

Regards

John Holtom

Yes, of course they're market

Yes, of course they're market traders-because guess what?-its a market!

However the legal profession has been so self satisfied as to not understand that-and stupid enough to pay the CMCs for work.

The CMCs already dominate the mid ranking legal sector and won't put up with nonsense from the likes of the SRA.

So nice thought-but no chance at all of it happening.

CMC's are barely regulated. A

CMC's are barely regulated. A monkey could be granted authorised status so long as the form was filled in and the fees paid.

Meanwhile, the burden of making sure that the CMC monkeys behave themselves and don't "cold call" possible clients for example gets dumped on the solicitor under his duties.