One in five firms likely to seek external investment
A third of small and mid-sized practices are considering merging in the next two or three years and one in five are likely to seek external investment, according to the results of the Law Society Law Management Section’s latest benchmarking survey.
The report, published today, revealed that while firms are looking at merging with other law practices, mergers with an independent financial adviser, accountancy practice, estate agent or other non-lawyer were considered unlikely by the vast majority.
Of the 166 firms that responded, one in five said they were likely to seek external investment for expansion, and a similar number thought it likely that they would bring in one or more non-lawyer owners, for example, in HR, IT, or finance or their spouse.
One in six reported that they would sell the practice to a third party if the opportunity arose.
Firms had less appetite for joining groups or networks, such as QualitySolicitors, Connect2Law or Local Law, with less than 10% thinking their practice would be likely to join one in the next few years.
The 13th annual health check on the profession shows that median fee income increased by 3.6% in 2012 as firms continued to adapt to challenges in the legal marketplace, better than the 1% growth seen last year.
While this is positive news, the report notes that with inflation hovering around 3% this means that there has been a small amount of growth in real terms.
Median fee income per equity partner rose 2.4% from £545,568 in 2011 to £558,773 and net profit per equity partner was up 3.6% from £116,432 to £120,677.
Average fees per fee earner also rose to £119,313, compared with £116,201 in 2011, an increase of 2.7%.
The number of redundancies made during the last year continued to fall, with 3.2% of staff losing their jobs. Meanwhile, almost 80% of participants recruited new staff - in total, they recruited 824 new staff.
With the imminent ban on referral fees for personal injury work, participants were asked how much they paid for on referrals, showing that a median 9.7% of fee income from personal injury and clinical negligence work was paid over to providers, down slightly on last year.
The trend to outsource key functions in order to reduce costs and improve the bottom line continued, revealing that 46% of practices outsource their IT infrastructure and development, with a similar percentage also outsourcing their IT user support.
Approximately one practice in six outsources secretarial support, 11% outsource their reception function and 37% outsource their payroll function.
Despite continued challenges, firms are slightly more confident looking ahead than they were last year, predicting a median growth of 3.6% in the year ahead, compared with the 3% median growth predicted for 2011/12.
LawSociety president Lucy Scott-Moncrieff said: ‘There's no one-size-fits-all approach that will help firms emerge from the recession or adapt to tough market conditions facing the sector, but for many law firms, a robust management system underpins their success.’
Chris Marston, head of professional practices at Lloyds TSB Commercial, which sponsors the survey, added: ‘This year’s survey results demonstrate once again the remarkable resilience of the solicitors' profession.’
News
- LETR ‘delayed by regulators’
- UK turns back on EU justice project
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals


Comments
Dubious Conclusions
116 Firms responded?
How can such conclusions be drawn on such a limited sample?
Law Management Section Benchmarking survey.
Whether or not the survey sample is large enough (it is, as it conforms to the central limit theorem) two significant issues emerge:
1. An apparent reluctance to join one of the new groups or networks despite their capability to invest in and deliver tools to enable service delivery improvements not available to the smaller independents
2. A fees per fee earner figure that is positively scary. Given there are very few fee earners in the small to medium size cohort that can actually bill more than 1200 hours p.a. once discounts and mark-downs are taken into account; the powerful implication is that the average charge out rate is almost exactly £100 per hour.
This does not bode well for the future and is NOT an indicator of a resilient profession
Law Society LMS Annual Financial Benchmarking Survey.
I see the copy has now been corrected - my thanks to the online team at the Gazette.
In response to voldemort's comment, this level of participation does make this one of the largest and most wide-ranging surveys of its type, and it's certainly the most detailed. We'd love to see more firms participating and the team at Hazlewoods has worked hard to make the input of financial data as straightforward as it can be for participants. The survey has also been opened up to non-LMS members for the first time.
The conundrum is that the profession tells us it wants robust financial benchmarking data, but is too often reluctant to take part in the surveys that will produce it!
Like Ashley, I was surprised at the low level of interest in joining member groups and networks - these can bring worthwhile advantages without necessarily losing or diluting the firm's identity.
Not good news for QS then?
Less than 10% want to join QS? Im not buying that at all. All lawyers want to join QS according to Mr Holt. They all love the pretty colours and the tantalising little song which makes me want to avoid WHSmith for my morning free read of Tattooed Girls (below top shelf).
On a more serious note - the same issue was faced by insurance brokers 15 years ago. The ones that survived, merged or changed service lines from personal lines to commercial. (read here: http://www.rokmanlaing.co.uk/index.php/blogs/item/9-high-street-law-adapt-or-die?)
So I'm surprised its only a third. Merging works.
Law Management Section Benchmarking survey
This surge in the number of law firms considering mergers, reported above, confirms our own research http://bit.ly/Y9hviX
Anecdotally we understand that banks are encouraging some firms that they lend to consider merging in order to cut costs and diversify their businesses. The implication being that some banks are reluctant to lend to law firms that are too focused on one part of the legal market.
Smaller less diversified law firms can suffer from irregular cash flow. The record number of requests that we are getting from law firms for short term funding definitely supports the idea that even highly profitable law firms continue to suffer from unpredictable cash flow.
Philip White, CEO, Syscap