PC fee up 5%, Law Society council agrees
The Law Society council today approved a practising certificate fee increase of £16 for 2012/13. The fee for each solicitor will rise from £328 to £344. Individual Compensation Fund contributions rise from £60 to £92.
The contribution for firms will increase from £722 to £1,340.
PC fee increases follow last year’s 23% drop and have been set to replenish reserves that were used up during 2011/12. The proposals will be submitted to the Legal Services Board for formal approval.
Law Society chief executive Desmond Hudson said: ‘The funding requirement to meet the budget for 2013 would have been just over £100m, but during the current year, the Law Society group has accessed £10m from reserves, mainly to meet overrun costs on certain IT projects.
‘In order to gradually rebuild those reserves, the proposed 2013 net funding requirement has been set at £103.5m. The alternative, to replenish those reserves in one go with a large increase in the PC fee, would have placed an unnecessary burden on the profession.’
Increases in the Compensation Fund contribution, recommended by the Solicitors Regulation Authority, are intended to ensure sufficient funds to cover a predicted increase in claims in the coming year.
The practising fee meets the cost of regulation, much of the Law Society's work as a professional body, and the levies the Law Society has to pay towards the costs of the Legal Services Board, the Legal Ombudsman and the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal.
News
- LETR ‘delayed by regulators’
- UK turns back on EU justice project
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees


Comments
"mainly to meet overrun costs
"mainly to meet overrun costs on certain IT projects"
So not only did mySRA not work - we are having to pay out more for it?
(and am I the only person who thinks it strange that the recent nomination process for COFA / COLP and notification under QASA did not use mySRA, but used a separate system?)
I am glad our professional masters at the Law Society / SRA have helped us by using more online systems to save money. http://www.sra.org.uk/sra/news/press/lessons-learned-survey-mysra.page
Can't wait to save more money in future years when they implement even more systems that don't work.
What is the point of the Law
What is the point of the Law Society? In the old days it represented and stood up for te profession against the government. Now it is peopled by lickspittles looking to line their pockets