- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Plans drawn up to expand patent opinions service
Thursday 21 June 2012 by Catherine Baksi
The Intellectual Property Office (IPO) has set out proposals to expand its patent opinions service and is seeking views on improving its mediation service to help cut the costs of resolving patent disputes.
The patent opinion service allows individuals or companies to get an opinion on the validity or infringement of a patent for a flat fee of £200. The IPO is consulting on expanding the range of questions that can be handled and on a proposed new power to consider revoking a patent if it issues an opinion concluding it is invalid. The IPO is also seeking views on why the take-up of its mediation service is low.
The moves follow the Hargreaves Review into intellectual property, which found that the costs of protecting and enforcing intellectual property rights prevent small and medium-sized businesses from making the most of their IP. The consultation on the opinion service runs until 4 September and the call for evidence on the mediation service finishes on 24 July.
Gordon Harris, head of IP at international firm Wragge & Co, said that the opinion service is well used, but ‘toothless’. He said some of the proposals would ‘give it a few more teeth’, especially broadening the scope of the questions that can be asked. But he said this would not help the majority of micro-businesses in England and Wales.
Harris said that mediation would be a more tangible help to small businesses seeking to protect their rights, but that parties are often unaware of the current service.
‘If they are going to improve it, they need to give it proper structure and rules, and publicity. Courts should also be obliged to suggest mediation to parties,’ he said.
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS