- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Plant: firms 'deluded' to think ABSs won't have impact
A regulation chief has warned the UK’s biggest commercial firms that they are ‘deluded’ to think alternative business structures will not affect them.
Solicitors Regulation Authority chairman Charles Plant told the Association of Personal Injury Lawyers conference on Friday that no firm could assume they would be immune from the impact of the new ownership model. ‘For those firms and businesses who say they have no interest I say you’re looking through the wrong end of the telescope,’ he said.
‘Your competitors are very interested, as are the young lawyers who represent your future. The tentacles of ABSs spread to many other areas and will impact directly on you.’
Young lawyers entering the profession want to be part of progressive practices, Plant said. ‘The new generation want to control their destiny and, given the choice between joining a traditional law firm with slow steps up the ladder and joining one with share options, many will take the latter course. City of London firms take note.’
Plant, a former partner at City firm Herbert Smith, said ‘Well-run, ambitious firms who understand what is going on in the market will treat this period as one where the opportunities are great. If these firms take the opportunities I am sure they will succeed, just as those who fail to take the opportunities I fear are doomed to fail.’
He stated that 74 applications for ABS status were now at an advanced stage and denied there had been delays to the process.
The SRA announced its first three successful licences last month but no further applications have been completed since then. Of the next round, Plant said: ‘Many are not straightforward, some of the structures being proposed are complex and need careful scrutiny by us, whilst some are incomplete. There is no backlog - the applications are being properly and efficiently processed.
‘You will have read some applicants have expressed surprise by the rigour but that is what the protection of the public and the profession requires.’
Plant said it was important that personal injury firms prepare themselves for the future, with government reforms of civil litigation set to coincide with new competitors gaining ABS status. He gave his backing to law firms having official links with claims management companies and said it was one option for negating the effects of a ban on referral fees.
Plant also warned that the SRA will be looking closely at firms that continue to offer services on a no win, no fee basis.
‘Some firms will conduct too many cases on contingency fees and will expose themselves to collapse if they don’t win those cases. We will conduct enquiries on such firms.’
- UK turns back on EU justice project
- LETR ‘delayed by regulators’
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code