- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Professor Gus John to carry out SRA racism review
Professor Gus John is to carry out an independent comparative case review to determine if there is any evidence of racism in the way the Solicitors Regulation Authority investigates black and minority ethnic (BME) solicitors.
The SRA, which the Society of Black Lawyers (SBL) earlier this year accused of ’institutional racism’, has always denied any bias, saying that most complaints are made about solicitors at small firms – and most BME solicitors work at small firms.
John (pictured), who carried out a similar exercise for the Crown Prosecution Service in 2003, chairs the equality, diversity and social mobility advisory group for the Legal Education and Training Review. His latest appointment is one of a raft of measures agreed by the SRA in May this year as part of its commitment to being fair, proportionate and transparent.
John said: ‘I am pleased to have been approached to undertake this review as it is an important exercise for the SRA, and for BME solicitors and their practitioner groups. The review will draw on a number of random cases and the evidence gathered should help the organisation respond to the recent allegation from the SBL that it treats BME solicitors more harshly than their white counterparts.’
SBL chair Peter Herbert said: ‘We welcome the involvement of Professor Gus John, but our support is conditional on his having access, unlike Lord Ouseley, to the 14 cases of alleged race discrimination currently being brought against the SRA, which the SRA disclosed in April this year. It is for the professor to set the limit of his audit, not for the SRA to do so before it begins.’
John is expected to complete the report by late autumn.
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- PI firm turns to fixed-price mediation for post-Jackson world
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west PI paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS