Reform chief predicts 'sweaty palms' over costs budgets
Judges and lawyers will adapt to new costs management rules but the process may take some time, according to the senior judge charged with implementing the Jackson reforms.
Lord Justice Ramsey, who has taken over responsibility for the task from Lord Justice Jackson, admitted there will be 'a few sweaty palms' when lawyers are forced to present their budget for cases before the court.
From April 2013, firms will have to prepare a detailed budget setting out the entire costs of proceedings in time for the case management conference. Any departure from that budget will have to be approved by the court.
Speaking on Tuesday at a meeting of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, the High Court judge (pictured) said budgeting was a routine part of domestic life and will become accepted in litigation.
'It's a discipline that will grow with experience from other cases which show where the costs were spent and what assumptions are right to make,' he said.
Ramsey added that his experience of the costs pilot was that lawyers quickly got used to the new HB forms for costs management and estimates were more realistic as a result.
The courts have already indicated through the judgment in Henry v Mirror Group Newspapers last year that they are unlikely to allow recovery of costs that were not budgeted for.
Ramsey said that judges, who started a series of one-day training seminars this month, will also need time to adjust to the new regime and called for litigators to help them with the transition.
'It's a new discipline for the judiciary - clearly one will rely on co-operation between solicitors. I would suggest that as experience grows one will set reasonable budgets without any difficulty.'
News
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals


Comments
Ramsey said that judges, who
Ramsey said that judges, who started a series of one-day training seminars this month, will also need time to adjust to the new regime and called for litigators to help them with the transition
Who is going to help lawyers with the transition? We have more at stake
Henry -v- NGN
The appeal judgment is being handed down at 10.30 this coming Monday. Would appear Ramsey already knows the outcome?
Costs Budgeting
It would be nice to have the formal CPR Amendment Regulations issued (unless they have already appeared under the radar and I have missed them!?).
I am sure we all do not want to see our hard work on this issue "kicked into the long grass" at the last minute.
Costs Budget
This will be a disaster.
No final rules (as yet) and a complete lack of clarity on the meaning of "proportionality", with less than 3 months before their introduction.
Finally if Mr Justice Ramsey believes that both parties will reach an accord thereby minimising judicial time I fear he is sadly wrong .I have no doubt that cost budgetting hearings will be hard contested by boths sides .
Sweaty Palms Everywhere!
This sweaty palm phenomenon is something that anyone within striking distance of Judge Simon Brown in Birmingham has no doubt experienced! And, as Henry v NGN clearly confirms, it won’t just be Simon Brown that will induce this feeling, as judges up and down the country will be expected to actively manage and monitor costs budgets. Anyone with experience of sweaty palms out there that thinks Henry actually undermines Jackson, as some seem to be suggesting?