Regulators’ knuckles rapped on complaints handling
The Solicitors Regulation Authority is failing to comply fully with its duty to ensure complaints are properly handled, a review has found.
All legal regulators were this week ordered by the Legal Services Board (LSB) to improve the way they handle complaints. In a letter to the SRA, the board said the organisation had to be more proactive in ensuring complaints are handled well by firms it regulates.
The letter referred to a confidential draft of an SRA review, which found a ‘small but material rate of non-compliance with the complaints-handling requirements’. It added that this was compounded by some evidence of ‘poor attitude’ about complaints from consumers.
The LSB has told the SRA to target firms that present the most risk and do more to understand consumers’ experience of the complaints-handling process. Concerns have also been raised with the LSB about the extent to which solicitor firms are failing to assist barristers to meet their own regulatory requirements.
The SRA and Bar Standards Board have been invited to work more closely to find ways to help their regulated communities. The LSB’s concerns - set out in individual letters to all regulators - follow last week’s second annual ‘health check’ of legal services reform by the Legal Services Consumer Panel.
LSB chief executive Chris Kenny said: ‘Most regulators still have more to do in understanding the volume and nature of complaints, focusing on consumer experience of the process and, most importantly, using information about the effectiveness of complaints handling as part of their wider monitoring, supervision and enforcement activities.’
The SRA said new outcomes-focused regulation was proof that the needs of clients have been embedded into regulation.
Antony Townsend, SRA chief executive, said: ‘As we stressed when we launched OFR, it puts the consumer at the heart of legal services.
‘The handbook that we provide to the regulated community to guide their work provides the framework for this customer-focused approach.’
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS
- Grayling says no to regulating will-writing
- Society and bar join hands against criminal justice plans
- 100 jobs at risk as BLP seeks 15% salary cost cut
- Bar Council picks a former mandarin
- 30 to meet Grayling in legal aid crisis talks
- Shadow minister hints at ‘unwind’ of Jackson reforms
- Legal education move by embattled Co-op
- Government ‘ignoring’ calls for further RTA review
- Immigration clampdown ‘danger’ to legal sector
- Fiji rule of law report found in contempt
- ‘Don’t ditch quality,’ says Desmond Hudson
- Wragge & Co takes axe to legal support jobs
- Call for solicitors to use British Sign Language
- Foreign case influx at commercial court
- Government red tape reverse
- Sri Lanka relents on visit