Secret courts 'will conceal UK complicity in torture'
The UN special rapporteur on torture has said that so-called ‘secret courts’ could be used to suppress evidence of British collusion in torture.
Professor Juan Mendez, speaking at the thinktank Chatham House on 10 September, became the latest high-profile figure to criticise UK government plans - outlined in the Justice and Security Bill - to require courts to hear evidence in closed proceedings where issues of national security are involved.
Mendez, who was himself tortured by the Argentine junta during that country’s ‘dirty war’ in the 1970s, said: ‘If a country is in possession of information about human rights abuses, but isn't in a position to mention them, it hampers the ability to deal effectively with torture.’
British ministers, including former justice secretary Kenneth Clarke, have defended the use of closed material proceedings on the grounds that they protect the UK’s intelligence-sharing relationship with the US and other friendly governments. They argue that disclosing information obtained through covert means in court could put lives in jeopardy and expose sources of sensitive information.
In April, Parliament’s joint committee on human rights said that the government’s proposals would have a ‘very considerable impact’ on the reporting of matters of public interest and concern, and would reduce public confidence and trust ‘in both the government and the courts’.
The Justice and Security Bill had its second hearing in the House of Lords in July. The Liberal Democrats continue to oppose it, maintaining that closed material procedures were not part of the Liberal Democrat or Conservative manifestos in 2010, or part of the coalition agreement.
- Neuberger defends judges’ right to speak out on cuts
- HRA applies to soldiers on duty, Supreme Court confirms
- Hundreds face ‘unrated cycle’ as Balva fails
- Consumer panel promises ‘long game’ on will regulation
- Close down CMCs tomorrow - Desmond Hudson
- Wiltshire solicitor’s murderer jailed for 28 years
- Profits squeeze as top-50 firms open results season
- Prison term sought for quoting Society charity report
- Legal aid champion Storer honoured
- Hudson questions SRA’s firm finances disclosure
- Judges could quit over pensions
- Intervention row heads to Strasbourg
- Hunt begins for new SRA chief
- SRA ‘wrong to pursue costs via conduct rules’
- Jackson prompts spurt in law firm start-ups
- Legal aid cuts ‘end high-profile BME cases’
- Carbon footprint down 7% in legal sector
- Mystery surrounds legal training report
- Family lawyers divided over Prest decision
- Consumer rights boost welcomed by Society
- Old Bailey offers peek at ‘Dead Man’s Walk’
- Peer-to-peer pioneer
- EC in cartels drive
- Thousands of court workers to strike on Monday
- RTA claims still high despite referral fee ban
- Law firms warned on debt recovery
- Ombudsman claims wider territory
- SRA puts a price on extra intervention levy