- In Practice
- In Business
- Moving On
Society calls for flexibility in AML directive
The Law Society has called on the European Commission to maintain the flexibility of a risk-based approach to anti-money laundering (AML) compliance as the EC drafts its fourth European money laundering directive.
The Society’s response to a call for views also urges the commission to reinforce the protection of legal professional privilege and professional secrecy, and to take a proportionate and practical approach to transparency of corporate entities and legal arrangements.
A fourth European directive is expected to be published in October, following revised international standards on AML and counter-terrorism financing published by the international Financial Action Task Force in February and an EC report on the application of the third money laundering directive in April. The third directive has been in force since 2005. The commission’s report concluded that while existing money laundering legislation works well, its provisions need updating to incorporate the latest guidelines to combat new threats.
The commission also sought views on whether it should seek greater harmonisation of rules across Europe. In its response, published yesterday, the Law Society encourages the commission to retain the flexibility of a risk-based approach to due diligence, especially for pooled client accounts held by solicitors.
The Society says the commission should support the involvement of professional bodies in supervising compliance with obligations, and ensure that amendments to data protection requirements do not put firms at risk of being abused by criminals for the purposes of money laundering.
It says: ‘We do not believe the development of a European regulation on money laundering would adequately support a risk-based approach by member states or regulated entities.’ The commission is expected to publish the draft fourth directive in October, and any amendments are likely to be incorporated into UK law by the end of 2014.
The Law Society’s full submission can be read on the website.
- LETR ‘delayed by regulators’
- UK turns back on EU justice project
- Unanimous: profession votes for ‘training days’ action in protest over cuts
- International firms call off merger
- Hundreds attend legal aid protest rally
- Small business spurning legal services – LSB research
- HMRC proposes crackdown on LLP ‘disguised employment’
- PCT will mean the death of Welsh justice, lawyers warn
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals