Society pours cold water on the SRA’s red-tape bonfire
The Law Society has come to the defence of nearly half the items on a menu of ‘unnecessary’ red tape drawn up by the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Of 10 proposals for abolishing regulations and simplifying processes, the Society fully supports only four, opposes another four, and accepts two with reservations.
In a response to an SRA consultation, the Society says that some of the proposals ‘raise difficult issues of policy that seem to us to amount to more than red tape’ and that ‘there is a risk that the SRA may not be grappling appropriately with some of the issues raised by these questions’.
It raises particular concerns about proposals to remove restrictions on charging by in-house lawyers employed in not-for-profit organisations and to allow in-house solicitors employed by local authorities to charge charities for legal services.
Lifting the restrictions, the Society says, would allow local government in-house solicitors to compete with private practitioners, without entity regulation, in areas where previously this would not have been possible.
‘This suggests that local government in-house solicitors will be at an advantage to firms in private practice, who have higher regulatory costs and burdens; it is unclear why this should be the case.’
However the Society is more sympathetic to the proposal that originally inspired the red-tape challenge - to remove the need for training establishments to apply for approval to second their trainees to other organisations. ‘We have sympathy with this proposal because the existing system is laborious and provides little value to anyone,’ the Society says.
It also agrees with a proposal that it should be possible for compliance officers of a regulated body to be able to apply to be the officer for legal practice, and finance and administration for any related entities, without the need to be a manager or an employee of the related entities.
The cuts in red tape are due to feature in a new edition of the SRA Handbook to appear in April.
- Poor will suffer from court fee changes, MoJ warned
- Overwhelming public backing for legal aid: poll
- Fight PI changes, says MASS chair
- Mass meeting of barristers takes a stand on QASA
- Pannone turns to fixed-price mediation post-Jackson
- Grayling asks for quality standard for PCT firms
- 7,000 lawyers to hit the streets for free legal advice
- French revolution
- ‘Google’ asylum refusals
- Pilot aims to limit clinical negligence solicitors’ fees
- Will-writing could still be regulated
- In-house growth accelerating
- Appeal Court applies Russian law in dispute
- Insurers to revamp third-party code
- Court interpreters reject new contract deal
- European data plan labelled ‘demented’
- Saudi Arabia accepts registration of female lawyer
- Don’t worry about Jackson fallout – judge
- North-west paralegal initiative
- Criminal legal aid cuts to reach £370m
- SRA’s popularity slips
- Traffic courts to be set up
- Economy 'testing access to justice'
- MoJ plans crackdown on ‘so-called’ experts
- Midlands ABS issues ‘join us’ offer to insurers
- Law Society Excellence Awards now open for nomination
- Desperate PI firms breaking referral fee ban – AXA chief
- Jurors ‘confused’ on new media contempt
- End-to-end negligence defence practice sets up as ABS