Solicitors warned of divorce claims
Divorce solicitors could face thousands of compensation claims in cases where pensions were undervalued in a divorce settlement, a pensions consultant has claimed.
Divorce LifeLine suggests that since pension sharing was introduced in December 2000, around 750,000 people, in half the divorces across the country, could be entitled to claim thousands of pounds from their solicitors where their former spouse’s pension was undervalued.
The company’s founding partner Tony Derbyshire said that in 96% of the 171 divorce settlements it had looked at, solicitors had not sought expert advice on the pension value. ‘It is easy to undervalue the pension without the expert advice of an actuary or independent financial adviser, and it seems most divorce lawyers have failed to seek this advice,’ he said.
But James Copson, partner at London firm Withers, said courts are reluctant to grant permission for expert evidence in pensions cases to obtain a valuation.
‘Courts will only allow such evidence if there is a big pension or if it forms a large proportion of the resources. That’s the fundamental problem,’ he said.
Copson said that in the ‘most gross cases’, it might be right to pursue the solicitor, but he added: ‘It’s a difficult area because solicitors are not experts, and experts come at a cost, which some clients are not willing to pay.’
Kate Hamilton, partner at London firm Russell Cooke, said that any post-divorce reviews of settlements should take into account the plethora of considerations that lie behind them and not treat them as straightforward accounting exercises.
News
- Close down CMCs tomorrow - Desmond Hudson
- Wiltshire solicitor’s murderer jailed for 28 years
- Profits squeeze as top-50 firms open results season
- Prison term sought for quoting Society charity report
- Legal aid champion Storer honoured
- Hudson questions SRA’s firm finances disclosure
- Hunt begins for new SRA chief
- Judges could quit over pensions
- Intervention row heads to Strasbourg
- SRA ‘wrong to pursue costs via conduct rules’
- Jackson prompts spurt in law firm start-ups
- Legal aid cuts ‘end high-profile BME cases’
- Carbon footprint down 7% in legal sector
- Mystery surrounds legal training report
- Family lawyers divided over Prest decision
- Consumer rights boost welcomed by Society
- Old Bailey offers peek at ‘Dead Man’s Walk’
- Peer-to-peer pioneer
- EC in cartels drive
- Thousands of court workers to strike on Monday
- RTA claims still high despite referral fee ban
- Law firms warned on debt recovery
- Ombudsman claims wider territory
- SRA puts a price on extra intervention levy

Comments
Pensions on Divorce
We prepare actuarial reports on pension sharing. Ultimately, it's the clients choice whether to have one, unless the Court requires a report. Use of the Single Joint Expert facility can save a lot of arguments. When instructing an expert, consider asking for a table of shares, to help the parties see the results of various options, and ask for offsetting figures too, unless there are no/few other assets. We are happy to provide an email for free stating that pensions involved are not worth any more attention than a CETV - based split - we don't want to make money out of the 'tiddlers'. I understand that if the parties don't want to address pension issues, solicitors will get them to sign a note to put on file to this effect. I would therefore expect this to cover them, although this is a legal issue, and I'm an actuary, not a lawyer! Another tip is to ensure you have details of the benefits, as well as CETV's, for schemes - essential for pension sharing or offsetting. Also allow time for pension schemes to provide these - they can take months! We can do this for you if you provide a signed Letter of Authority to the scheme - as we know how to 'speak pension' to the schemes, it saves time and we can often speed things up!
Above all, tackle the pension issues early and get as much info as possible.
Enjoy your pension work!
Peter