SRA eases insurers’ disclosure rules
Professional indemnity insurers will not be required to tell solicitors if their credit rating changes during the year of cover, regulators have decided.
Following lobbying from the insurance industry, the Solicitors Regulation Authority has eased rules regarding insurers’ disclosure. Under the Qualifying Insurer’s Agreement approved earlier this year, each insurance firm must now tell the SRA and each client their credit rating.
But it was agreed at last week’s SRA board meeting that informing individual law firms if that rating changed during the indemnity period would be too onerous. Instead, insurers will only have to keep the regulator updated during the year.
Meanwhile, the Law Society has urged its members to demand to know what commission is taken by brokers securing them professional indemnity insurance. The European Commission has proposed to require mandatory disclosure of commissions for all insurance intermediaries.
But the Society reminded solicitors that indemnity insurance brokers are already required to reveal such figures under Financial Services Authority rules.
Law Society head of regulation Elliott Vigar said: ‘By requesting information now from brokers on their total remuneration, including commission, our members can go into the PII renewal period with a clear picture of what is on offer and make the right decisions based on having all that information to hand.
‘There is no sensible argument for brokers’ commissions to be kept secret.’
The Society has campaigned for more disclosure from brokers and has produced a Buyers’ Guide to help its members better understand insurance relationships.
News
- Neuberger defends judges’ right to speak out on cuts
- HRA applies to soldiers on duty, Supreme Court confirms
- Hundreds face ‘unrated cycle’ as Balva fails
- Consumer panel promises ‘long game’ on will regulation
- Close down CMCs tomorrow - Desmond Hudson
- Wiltshire solicitor’s murderer jailed for 28 years
- Profits squeeze as top-50 firms open results season
- Prison term sought for quoting Society charity report
- Legal aid champion Storer honoured
- Hudson questions SRA’s firm finances disclosure
- Old Bailey offers peek at ‘Dead Man’s Walk’
- Peer-to-peer pioneer
- EC in cartels drive
- Judges could quit over pensions
- Intervention row heads to Strasbourg
- Hunt begins for new SRA chief
- SRA ‘wrong to pursue costs via conduct rules’
- Jackson prompts spurt in law firm start-ups
- Legal aid cuts ‘end high-profile BME cases’
- Carbon footprint down 7% in legal sector
- Mystery surrounds legal training report
- Family lawyers divided over Prest decision
- Consumer rights boost welcomed by Society
- Thousands of court workers to strike on Monday
- RTA claims still high despite referral fee ban
- Law firms warned on debt recovery
- Ombudsman claims wider territory
- SRA puts a price on extra intervention levy

Comments
So Funny
"it was agreed at last week’s SRA board meeting that informing individual law firms if that rating changed during the indemnity period would be too onerous"
Hahaha - really difficult & onerous to send out a mail merged letter to all their insured's direct from their databases.
The SRA just havent got a clue