SRA research reveals 'power' of high street firms

SRA-133.jpg
Thursday 09 August 2012 by Catherine Baksi

High street firms have ‘power’ and are known in their communities, the first phase of a consumer research project conducted by the Solicitors Regulation Authority has revealed.

The study to look at how the public access legal services was commenced last month and announced today. Over the rest of the year the SRA will travel to towns and cities across England and Wales to gauge the opinions of local people on the legal services market.

The research will seek to identify the problems consumers face when using a legal service and how outcomes could be improved.

The SRA team will also talk to law firms, and information providers such as Citizens Advice, charities, law centres and trade unions to understand how the public obtains information about legal services and how this could be improved.

SRA head of research Tim Livesley said: ‘It's great to be out on the road talking to legal services consumers across the country. We hope to improve our understanding of the barriers to consumers achieving good outcomes with a legal services provider, and what types of information can help break down some of these barriers.’

The regulator’s policy officer for consumer affairs Richard Silver said: ‘We found that many people were familiar with firms with local offices, which indicates the power the high street practice still has in some communities.

The next phases of the research project are scheduled for Birmingham later this month.

The SRA plans to publish the research report in early 2013.

Comments

SRA "research"

Good grief..."High street firms have ‘power’ and are known in their communities..." Whatever next? SRA research to reveal that day follows night, dogs chase cats etc.

who is paying for this

who is paying for this irrelevant drivel?

Who pays

You are.

Coming to Brum - great!

I can't wait for Timmy or Dick to knock on my door. All i'd need would be five minutes, a baseball bat and a spade to get my point across!

Holy cow! Should they not

Holy cow! Should they not have identified "the problems consumers face when using a legal service" and "the barriers to consumers achieving good outcomes with a legal services provider" before now?They seem quite happy to tell us how to run our practices without, apparently, any background knowledge!

Too late the hero

The SRA have seemed intent on putting most of the high street firms out of business over the last 10 years.

Having predominantly now done so, is this a volte-face now they've realised the public don't like dealing with the giant superfirms?

Too late - most of us have vanished, and I'm aiming to go find a cabin in the woods to avoid the hideousness that is regulatory bodies and self congratulatory research.

Breathtaking, and this cost

Breathtaking, and this cost how much? Amazing to see how the SRA seems to have become some outreach department of Social Services; the assumption that influences everything they do is the tired old mantra of "lawyers bad - public good". How about this for on trend bureaucrat speak - "we hope to improve our understanding of the barriers to consumers achieving good outcomes with a legal services providers, and what types of information can help break down some of these barriers."

What does this uber trendy claptrap actually mean? Once again, the SRA wants to "understand" consumers and like some white knight "break down" barriers that those nasty lawyers have thrown up to prevent the consumer from getting what he deserves. Oh please. You can tell that these people have forgotten what it is like to run a business - if that is they ever did. Fact of the matter is that for many "consumers", the aim is to pay as little as possible and get as much as possible - anything else is not a "good outcome". They'll do this in much the same way that some will gripe to a garage that the paintwork on their repaired car does not have the appearance of painted glass - ignoring that they only want to pay bargain basement money for a Rolls Royce job. The problem is that the uber credulous yet highly dangerous meddlers at the SRA have committed themselves to encouraging this inane mindset.

Buying legal services is not like buying a bag of bananas and never will be, and in encouraging a "race to the bottom" on the pretext that consumers must have low price or no price but a premier league service is total folly. Much of the work that the profession is expensive for a reason; it is complex and therefore costly. Often clients do not get the outcome they want - oftern because it is impossible to do so. Any number of discussions can often fail to shake a firmly held but incorrect belief. It costs considerable sums to operate a practice and like other businesses this is reflected in the price of the goods/services. It is simple as that. The fact that "consumers" will want to pay less for legal services does not need an expensive survey.

I expect that the only tangible "outcome" from this jolly jape will be more red tape and diktats to ensure that consumers unrealistic expectations are fulfilled. Is there anyone in the SRA who has an ounce of common sense? Seldom has so much power been wielded by an organisation so manifestly unsuited to wielding it.

Money well spent?

If the SRA does not already know how members of the public access legal services, on what basis has it been deciding how best to regulate the solicitors' profession?

On the basis that the SRA

On the basis that the SRA makes lots of money!

SAR CONSUMER RESEARCH

I'm sorry but I'll be too busy filling in rubbish like diversity forms to meet you. The High Street having power? You are having the proverbial! The only potential positive is that our esteemed visitors will get to meet the part of the profession that is being shat on and shafted by the boys in red braces, w(b)ankers and lenders and this might stir the conscience. Fat bloody chance!!!

Power of High Street

I wonder if hidden behind this is a desire of SRA to educate "consumers" about alternative sources of providers of legal services. SRA wants ABSs to succeed and needs new entrants to make the move to OFR worth all the effort and hype.
Alternatively it's a recognition that the High Street firm is not dead and buried.
I wonder if LSB and the Consumer Panel will be pleased to hear that despite their best efforts not much has changed.
Why don't SRA just concentrate on regulating?

Power of High Street

Another example of the oxygen thieves at work. Between the SRA and the Ombudsman I now hate being in this profession. It's a disgrace that this kind of wasteful initiative is allowed. Shows how out of touch with reality they are.

Power in the High Street

I hope that in investigating the legal services market in the High Street the researchers look into the operation of the Code involving referral fees at the point of sale. As we know it is the referral fee paying solicitor's duty to ensure that the Estate Agent does not pressurise the Client into using the firm which pays the fee.

As we all know this does not happen. Uunregulated and unaccountable 'Power' is given to the Estate Agent over the Solicitor and the Client and any other professional who pays such a fee i.e Suveyors and Mortgage Brokers. This is where the ‘Power ‘ lies and let's hope this is looked into when the SRA make their investigations.

SRA research reveals 'power' of high street firms

Absolutely unbelievable clap trap.

You simply could'nt make this up!!!! Having helped to close down a huge swathe of the legal services which used to be open to the public, I rather wonder what legal services these worthy stalwarts of the SRA are referring to?

The words: 'consumers', 'outcomes' and 'legal service providers' just says it all !!!