Straw’s pay warning to legal aid lawyers

Jack-Straw.jpg
Thursday 12 March 2009 by Neil Rose

Lawyers and law firms dependent on state funding would be ‘wise to reconsider’ their expectations of earnings, the Lord Chancellor has warned.

In a stark vision of the future, underlining the government’s determination to press ahead with controversial legal aid reforms, Jack Straw said last week that while it is ‘entirely proper’ that lawyers are paid decent rates, running ‘successful legal businesses... is not the purpose of law’.

Speaking to an audience at the London School of Economics, Straw questioned whether legal aid lawyers should expect to be paid more than other public sector employees. While many legal aid lawyers have modest incomes, ‘for others, particularly at the top of the profession, and sometimes also in the middle ranks, the picture is very different and there is an expectation that they should receive rewards comparable to those in private practices’.

Straw said that the Legal Services Act would allow law firms to adapt. ‘This may well mean lone practitioners joining together, or smaller firms growing larger,’ he said. He dismissed suggestions that the changes would reduce access to justice. ‘I think access is at risk of being confused with physical proximity. People have grown used to a far wider range of telephone and internet-based services – and demand more rapid and convenient access to services, but not necessarily an office on the street corner,’ he said.

‘A further question individual practices need to consider is whether or not all of the functions currently carried out by qualified solicitors and barristers need always to be carried out by them... As paralegals take on more responsibility, as the legal executive profession develops, there should be scope to do more, quicker and at lower cost without standards falling.’

Straw drew an analogy with opticians’ services, largely provided by high street chains, ‘which benefit from substantial economies of scale, which in turn are passed on to the customer... The important factor here is that there has been no decline in the quality of the clinical service’.

Straw’s analysis drew mixed responses. Carol Storer, director of the Legal Aid Practitioners Group, said: ‘Legal aid lawyers work long hours, endure a great deal of stress and are often paid well below the market rate. Furthermore, an enormous amount of time is given up working with the Legal Services Commission and the Ministry of Justice trying to help the government devise and deliver the service. It would be good if these efforts were appreciated by government rather than undermined.’

Richard Miller, the Law Society’s legal aid manager, said: ‘The Law Society has always stood for a legal profession acting in the best interests of its clients and serving an important role in ensuring access to justice. We share the government’s aim of a vibrant profession offering the highest professional standards to the public.’

Comments

GP salaries would be fine

No one who joins a high street legal aid practice expects to match City salaries though we work similar hours- the satisfaction is obtaining results for clients. However the salary of the average GP would be very attractive indeed- and some of us have consultant's skills. Appropriate delegation has always been an essential part of legal aid work but the clients deserve something better than wholesale deskilling- which is what many of us see in the government's plans. Clients know very well the benefits that experienced lawyers bring them- and the savings to public funds can be very considerable

legal aid pay

I have been in practice in legal aid for 25 years this month. My firm has worked with every initiative, accepted low returns for high quality work, served our clients and our community for 35 years this summer. My partners and I have taken no increase in our drawings for three years at least.I still earn far less than a teacher of comparative experience, or a police inspector.I am not asking for a high return, but a fair return, and not for me necessarily, but for the next generation who still care about providing support to the socially disadvantaged. Why would anyone go through university and College of Law, and amass that level of debt, to earn such low rewards? Who can afford to? The use of paralegals has increased, but they still need to be supervised and taught.Who will be left to do this?

Legal Aid Budget

Jack Straws seems only to comment on legal aid to say lawyers are being paid too much. It is a crude political tactic to put pressure on Legal Aid providers to reduce costs, but ignores the reality of the costs in the system.

While LAG believes some savings can be made by firms having more efficient administration and the delegating of work to paralegals, the Government is being over optimistic in believing that these will lead to massive cost savings. Very High Cost Cases remain the biggest problem in the legal aid system and these cases by there nature are the least amenable to the stripping out of costs in this way.

Past experience shows that cash will have to be found to meet the need for legal advice from people suffering from the impact of the recession. The Government is naive if it believes this can be found in full from squeezing suppliers.

Legal aid lawyers work long

Legal aid lawyers work long hours, endure a great deal of stress and are often paid well below the market rate. Furthermore, an enormous amount of time is given up working with the Legal Services Commission and the Ministry of Justice trying to help the government devise and deliver the service. It would be good if these efforts were appreciated by government rather than undermined.

We have removed a link from this comment is it was unclear how the link related to the comment. Gazette editorial

The Government is naive if it

The Government is naive if it believes this can be found in full from squeezing suppliers.