‘Swift’ justice to become ‘norm’ in criminal cases

Riot policeman walks past a burning car in Hackney
Friday 13 July 2012 by Catherine Baksi

Dealing with criminal cases in 'hours and days' could become 'the norm' under government plans announced today.

Policing and criminal justice minister Nick Herbert published a white paper detailing proposals designed to speed up cases in the criminal justice system. Extended court sittings, increased use of video technology, and single magistrates sitting in community centres or police stations are among the measures outlined.

Building on responses adopted during last year’s summer riots, the government plans to trial more flexible court opening hours, including the introduction of Sunday sittings, and early morning and evening sittings.

The white paper also suggests enabling local communities to deal with anti-social behaviour and low-level offending through neighbourhood justice panels in 15 areas across the country.

These will use community representatives and restorative justice techniques in a bid to tackle problems early and prevent them escalating.

Herbert said: ‘During last year’s riots, we saw cases that normally take weeks and months being dealt with in just hours and days. We want this to become the norm, not the exception.

‘The criminal justice system must be more transparent and accountable to the local communities it services, so we are opening up the justice system and involving communities directly in resolving problem behaviour and low-level crimes.’

Richard Atkinson, chair of the Law Society Criminal Law Committee, voiced scepticism about the proposals.

He said: 'The Society has been at the forefront of urging improvements to the criminal justice system and we published our own proposals for this last year. We would support changes where they are appropriate. For example there is potential for there to be efficiency improvements arising from the increased use of prison to court video links.
 
'However, we are concerned by the government’s obsession with speed and its apparent belief that speed and efficiency is one and the same thing.
 
'In particular, we question whether there is any need for weekend courts at a time when the numbers of criminal cases are declining and when these proposals will cause problems for prisons and the availability of other professionals in the system. There will be significant costs at a time the government says there is no more money, including for defence practitioners who are mostly small businesses and do not have the same flexibility as large employers, such as the Crown Prosecution Service and the court service. 

'The fact that there has been no adequate consultation and discussion with defence practitioners about the proposals suggests that, yet again, government is ignoring the only people in the system who see cases through from start to finish.
 
'We are keen to discuss these with government, but it is mistaken if it believes that these changes can be achieved in a way which is cost-neutral and it is disappointing that it has not taken the opportunity to look at other improvements which are likely to have a much greater effect on efficiency than a headline-grabbing initiative on court sittings.' 

Max Hill QC, Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association (CBA), warned that cost-cutting must not stand in the way of justice.

He said: 'The Criminal Bar Association endorses the government’s view that the criminal courts need to become more efficient, and we welcome many of the proposals contained within this white paper, but others risk undermining justice and due process.

'We are particularly concerned about the increased presumption that cases will be run in the Magistrates’ Courts based purely on the financial value of the case. This is a blunt instrument which may not properly reflect the severity of the offence, and demonstrates the government’s commitment to cheap justice.

'We cautiously welcome efforts to increase transparency by allowing cameras into courtrooms for sentencing remarks. This must, however, be carefully monitored to ensure that tight judicial scrutiny is maintained and that the parties in the case are consenting.

'Late and weekend court sittings enabled the criminal justice system to manage its vastly increased workload following the summer riots, but longer hours are not the answer to inefficiency. They place a strain on the courts and on court workers, and may lead to delays and poor outcomes.'

Meanwhile, as the government proposes extending court sittings, the Ministry of Justice’s annual report showed that HM Courts and Tribunal Service has culled its staff by more than 1,000 over the last year. Published this week, the report shows that permanent staff numbers at HMCTS fell from 20,778 to 19,655.

The full details of the government’s ‘Swift and Sure Justice’ proposals, can be found on the MoJ website.

Comments

Why don't we just cut out the

Why don't we just cut out the middle man and go for straight for the Judge Dredd approach where justice is dispensed on the spot without any need for evidence or a trial. Clearly the Tories won't be happy until this happens so let's just stop the procrastination and steady decline and go straight to the end goal.

Maybe the Law Society could suggest a return to trial by ordeal by way of a response? It may be more effective and show up how ridiculous this all is than the usual meek response as per the above.

Surely you mean "...straight

Surely you mean "...straight to the end gaol"?

Welcome to Hazzard County UK

What with elected police commissioners, the Americanisation of English Justice is well under way....but without a written constitution. The higher courts are going to be very very busy !

Hideous hideous idea. How are

Hideous hideous idea. How are firms meant to balance work/life balances with their staff?? It's bad enough working out rotas for police stations and Saturday remand courts, never mind factoring in evening and full weekend sittings! Most defence firms are small, with fewer than 10 solicitors - how on earth are we meant to factor in the Working Time directive to this??

Personally I would have immense child care problems working at an evening court, as would many others.
The CPS are currently at breaking point with the amount of staff that have been made redundant in the last year - are those who are left meant to pick up this slack? or will they just employ more and more agents?

And as the article says, all this at a time when case numbers are declining!

Smoke and mirrors me thinks - 90% of it won't happen! (she says with crossed fingers!)

Overworked, underpaid, spat on

I suppose I represent the typical criminal defence lawyer. Already working 9 hour week days and a Saturday morning remand court for a salary which I'd get more prorata working at Tesco's mopping the floors. Questioning the rational and sanity of my decision for working in the criminal sector and salivating at those more lucrative less-stressful 9to5 areas of law I could have chosen.

How I am meant to give up more time in the evenings and weekends when invariably I'm already covering my fair share of Police Station attendances.

It sounds impossible and preposterous to me and I'm single, no kids or commitments, with a modest social life.

I share a thought for my fellow professionals, the interpreters, the magistrates, the legal advisers all the way down to the G4S van drivers and security staff expected to work round the clock.

Additionally Video link is a fantastic system in theory, however due to software/hardware problems and PEBCAK it invariably takes longer and most costly than the old fashioned way.

‘Swift’ justice to become ‘norm’ in criminal cases

Having just, yet again, had a foreign national held over a weekend as no ALS interpreter turned up on Friday 13th (ho ho). Exactly HOW are the courts going to get anyone to turn up on a Sunday?????

You won't get me in court on a Sunday anyway....I'm too busy stretching my income at my local Car Boot Sale...